Species Card of Copepod
Calanoida ( Order )
    Calanoidea ( Superfamily )
        Calanidae ( Family )
            Calanus ( Genus )
Calanus marshallae  Frost, 1974   (F,M)
Syn.: ? Calanus finmarchicus : M.W. Johnson, 1961 (p.311, Table 2);
Ref.:
Frost, 1974 (p.77, figs.F,M); Gardner & Szabo, 1982 (p.136, figs.F,M); Brodsky & al., 1983 (p.158, figs.F,M, Rem.); van der Spoel & Heyman, 1983 (p.62, fig.78); Bradford, 1988 (p.76, Rem.); Bucklin & al., 1995 (p.658); Chihara & Murano, 1997 (p.738, Pl.66: F,M); Sundt & Melle, 1998 (p.207, fig.2, 3, Rem: mitochondrial sequence); Hill & al., 2001 (p.279, fig.2: phylogénie)
Species Calanus marshallae - Plate 1 of morphological figuresissued from K. Hulsemann in Invert. Taxon., 1994, 8. [p.1477, Fig.28, A].
Female: A, urosome (left: ventral); right: dorsal). Pore signature schematic by pooled samples (symbols are considerably larger than pores): Filled circle: 100 % presence; open circle: 95-99 % presence; triangle: 50-89 % presence. n = 95.


Species Calanus marshallae - Plate 2 of morphological figuresissued from : G.A. Gardner & I. Szabo in British Columbia Pelagic Marine Copepoda. Canadian Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sc., 1982, 62. [p.137]. After Woodhouse, 1971.
Female and Male. P5Bp1 : basipodite 1 of P5 ( with inner margin denticulate)


Species Calanus marshallae - Plate 3 of morphological figuresissued from : B.W. Frost in Mar. Biol., 1974, 26. [p.79, Fig.2].
Female: Forehead (right lateral and ventral view), showing accessory ohotoreceptor (ap) and lateral gland (lg) in lateral views only. Nauplius eye is indicated (in ventral views only) by dotted lines.
Comparison between Calanus finmarchicus (A), Calanus glacialis (B) and Calanus marshallae (C).
Scale bar: 0.1 mm.
Nota: The size of the accessory photoreceptor in both sexes is relatively much larger in Calanus marshallae; this diagnostic diffarence is evident in immature stages (Copepodid III-V).


Species Calanus marshallae - Plate 4 of morphological figuresissued from : B.W. Frost in Mar. Biol., 1974, 26. [p.79, Fig.3].
Male: Forehead (right lateral and ventral view), showing accessory photoreceptor (ap).
Comparison between Calanus finmarchicus (A), Calanus glacialis (B), and Calanus marshallae. (C).
Scale bar: 0.1 mm.


Species Calanus marshallae - Plate 5 of morphological figuresissued from : B.W. Frost in Mar. Biol., 1974, 26. [p.92, Fig.18].
Female: Right Mx2 (right lateral view). Comparison between Calanus finmarchicus (top row), Calanus glacialis (middle row) and Calanus marshallae (bottom row).
Scale bar: 0.1 mm.
Nota: Mx2 of Calanus marshallae nearly always (50 of 51 randomly selected specimens) has a circular cluster of wide, flat, hyaline spinules on the outer proximal surface; this surface on Mx2 of C. finmarchicus and C. glacialis is usually devoid of spinules (43 of 51 specimens, 37 of 45 specimens, respectively) or if present, the spinules are slender and minute..


Species Calanus marshallae - Plate 6 of morphological figuresissued from : B.W. Frost in Mar. Biol., 1974, 26. [p.91, Fig.17].
Female: Anal segment and caudal rami (cr, dorsal view). Comparison between Calanus finmarchicus (A), Calanus glacialis (B) and Calanus marshallae (C).
Scale bar: 0.1 mm.
Nota: The caudal ramus length in Calanus marshallae is approximately twice the caudal ramus width, but less than the width of the anal segment; in both Calanus finmarchicusCalanus glacialis the length of the caudal ramus is usually more than twice the width of the caudal ramus and about equal to the width of the anal segment.


Species Calanus marshallae - Plate 7 of morphological figuresissued from : B.W. Frost in Mar. Biol., 1974, 26. [p.80, Fig.4].
Female: Posterolateral margin of thoracic segment 5 and genital segment (gs) (right lateral view). Comparison between Calanus finmarchicus (A), Calanus glacialis (B) and Calanus marshallae (C).
Scale bar: 0.1 mm.


Species Calanus marshallae - Plate 8 of morphological figuresissued from : B.W. Frost in Mar. Biol., 1974, 26. [p.87, Fig.10].
Female: basipod and endoodite 1 of left P5 (anterior view). Comparison between Calanus finmarchicus (A), Calanus glacialis (B) and Calanus marshallae (C).
Scale bar: 0.1 mm.
Nota: In all 3 species, the denticulate medial margin of basipodite 1 of P5 has a variable number, spacing and size of denticles, so that the species cannot be routinely identified by the characters; nevertheless, there is a clear statistical trend in the number of denticles on the basipodite 1, with C. marshallae having the lowest average number and C. finmarchicus having the highest.
m = mean number of denticles, se = standard error, n = number of specimens examined. C. finmarchicus: m = 34,71, se = 0,40, n = 139.
C. glacialis: m = 30,20, se = 0,34, n = 131.
C. marshallae: m = 26,15, se = 0,43, n = 81.
C. marshallae exhibits the medial denticulate margin of the basipodite 1 usually markedly concave, so that the species is indistinguishable fro C. glacialis in this. Also, like C. glacialis, the spiniform process on the distal anterior margin of basipodite 2 of is thick and blunt on the right or left leg and the outer distal corner of endopodite 1 is usually narrowly tapered and sharply pointed. However, in contrast to C. glacialis, the medial margin of basiopdite 2 in C. marshallae tends to be convex, although not so curved as in C. finmarchicus. Thus, the P5 index (deviation of basipodite 2 - deviation of basipodite 1) for C. marshallae is intermediate between those of C. finmarchicus and C. glacialis, so that the average C. marshallae female is intermediate in size between them (see table 3 below)


Species Calanus marshallae - Plate 9 of morphological figuresissued from : B.W. Frost in Mar. Biol., 1974, 26. [p.89, Fig.14].
Male: left P5 (anterior view). Comparison between Calanus finmarchicus (A), Calanus glacialis (B) and Calanus marshallae (C).
Scale bar: 0.1 mm.
Nota: The structure of the P5 of C. marshallae is intermediate between C. finmarchicus and C. glacialis, although tending toward the former, but the lengths of exopodite 1 and exopodite 2 fall along dixtinct regression lines when plotted against prosome length (Fig. 20A,B). The significance of these differences in lengths of exopod 1 and exopod 2 among the 3 species is highlighted by the lack of similar displacements in length measurements of any other basipodal, exopodal or endopodal segment of the right or left P5 when plotted against prosome length (Fig.20C). Because in Fig.20A,B the lengths of exopod 1 and exopod 2 of C. marshallae overlap both C. finmarchicus and C. glacialis, there is no mesural characteristic of the P5 which can be used absolutely to distinguish adult males of C. marshallae from the two species.. As in the female, the length range of the male of C. marshallae broadly overlaps those of C. finmarchicus and C. glacialis (Table 3).


Species Calanus marshallae - Plate 10 of morphological figuresissued from : B.W. Frost in Mar. Biol., 1974, 26. [p.87, Table 3].
Female and Male. Range of total length (TL, mm) and prosome length (PL, mm). These data represent extremes of length measurements found in all material examined.
Total length measured laterally from the anterior margin of the head to the posterior margin of the caudal ramus (excluding setae)


Species Calanus marshallae - Plate 11 of morphological figuresissued from : B.W. Frost in Mar. Biol., 1974, 26. [p.93, Fig.20].
A: length of exopodite 1 of male left P5 plotted against prosome length (open squares, C. marshallae)
B: length of exopodite 2 of male left P5 plotted against prosome length (symbols as in A)
C: length of exopodite 3 of male right P5 plotted against prosome length (symbols as in A).
In all three graphs, thin lines are regression lines for C. finmarchicus (lower line) and C. glacialis (upper line).
Prosome length measured laterally from the anterior margin of the head to the posterolateral margin of 5th thoracic segment.

Compl. Ref.:
Sullivan & al., 1975 (p.176); Peterson & al., 1979 (p.467, Table 1, 2, fig.12, 13,14, 15); Nishiyama & Hirano, 1983 (p.159, Table 4: length-weight); Springer & al., 1989 (p.359, Fig.5, 10, 12, 15, 16, Table 1, 2) , Mackas & Sefton, 1982 (p.1173, Table 1); Springer & Roseneau, 1985 (p. 231, tab.1, 2, 3); Vidal & Smith, 1986 (p.523, Table 1, biomass); Smith & Vidal, 1986 (p.215, Table 6, 7, fig. 9, abundance): Mackas & Anderson, 1986 (p.115, Table 2); Peterson, 1986 (p.61, development); 1988 (p.229, egg production); McLaren & al., 1988 (p.275, DNA content, development rate: egg-nauplius); Coyle & al., 1990 (p.763); Shih & Marhue, 1991 (tab.2, 3); Huntley & Lopez, 1992 (p.201, Table 1, A1, eggs, egg-adult weight, temperature-dependent production); Osgood & Frost, 1994 (p.627, life history, vertical migration); Mauchline, 1998 (tab.27, 33, 45, 47, 48, 51, 58, figs.66, 68); Tsuda & Miller, 1998 (p.713, mate-behaviour); Gomez-Gutiérrez & Peterson, 1999 (p.637); Russell & al., 1999 (p.77, tab.1); Huggett & Richardson, 2000 (p.1843, tab.2); Lenz & al., 2000 (p.338); Mackas & al., 2001 (p.685, Tab. 3, 6, fig.3: interannual changes in species composition); Peterson & al., 2002 (p.353); Mackas & Galbraith, 2002 (p.725, tab.2a, 2b); 2002 a (p.423 (Table 2; Coyle & Pinchuk, 2002 (p.177, fig.2, 3, 4, Table 4, 5, annual variation); 6Napp & al., 2002 (p.5991, Table 1, fig.5, interannual variation); )Baier & Napp, 2003 (p.771); Park, W & al., 2004 (p.464, tab.1); Mackas & al., 2004 (p.875, Table 2); Baier & Terazaki, 2005 (p.1113, fig.4); Lamb & Peterson, 2005 (C10); Coyle, 2005 (p.77, fig.7,9, tab.2,3,4); Mackas & Coyle, 2005 (p.707, fig.7, 8); Mackas & al., 2005 (p.1011, 1021, tab.2); Mackas & al., 2006 (L22S07, Table 2); Hooff & Peterson 2006 (p.2610); Ware & McQueen, 2006 (p.28, Table B1, weight ranges); Lewis & al., 2006 (p.501, Table I); Deibel & Daly; 2007 (p.271, Table 4, Rem.: Arctic polynyas); Titelman & al., 1023, Table I, Rem: mating); Humphrey, 2008 (p.83: Appendix A); Liu & Hopcroft, 2008 (p.930: fig.7); Coyle & al., 2008 (p.1775, Table 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, fig.11, abundance): Walkusz & al., 2008 (p.1, Table 3, abundance); Darnis & al., 2008 (p.994, Table 1, figs.8, 9); Miller C.B., 2008 (p.332, fig.3: growth vs. time); Hopcroft & al., 2009 (p.9, Table 3); Galbraith, 2009 (pers. comm.); Lewis & al., 2010 (p.695, Table I); Homma & Yamaguchi, 2010 (p.965, Table 2); Hopcroft & al., 2010 (p.27, Table 1, 2); Homma & al., 2011 (p.29, Table 2, 3, 4, abundance, feeding pattern: suspension feeders); Matsuno & al., 2012 (Table 2); DiBacco & al., 2012 (p.483, Table S1, ballast water transport); Volkov, 2012 (p.474, Table 6, fig.7, 15, abundance, distribution, interannual variation); Irvine & Crawford, 2013 (p.1, Rem.: p.59, anomaly time series)
NZ: 3

Distribution map of Calanus marshallae by geographical zones
Species Calanus marshallae - Distribution map 2issued from : B.W. Frost in Mar. Biol., 1974, 26. [p.94, Fig.21].
Occurence of Calanus marshallae in plankton samples.
Loc:
Spitsberg, St. Lawrence Island, Chukchi Sea, Bering Sea (slope and shelf), Anadyr Strait, Shpanberg Strait, Chucki Sea, SE Beaufort Sea, Banks Is., Bering Sea, S Aleutian Basin, S Aleutian Is., G. of Alaska, British Columbia, Fjord system (Alice Arm & Hastings Arm), Portland Inlet, Dabob Bay, Hecate Strait, Vancouver Is., Oregon, off Newport.
N: 49
Lg.:
(329) F: 4,52-2,89; M: 4,24-3,28; (1041) F: 3,27; {F: 2,89-4,52; M: 3,28-4,24}
Rem.: For Frost (1974, p.90) this species is most easily vharacterized by descibing it in direct comparison with Calanus finmarchicus and Calanus glacialis. The new species and Calanus glacialis are very similar in body form, including the outline of the ventral surface of the genital segment in lateral view and the shape ofthe posterolateral margin of the 5th thoracic segment. These features immediately distinguish C. marshallae from C. finmarchicus. C. marshallae and C. finmarchicus do not co-occur, although there are a few reliable records of adult females of C. finmarchicus in the central Arctic Ocean and C. marshallae may be transported north of the Bering Strait. Woodhouse (1971) found that C. marshallae and C. pacificus (a species of the C. helgolandicus group) co-occur along the west coast of North America approximately between Latitudes 40° and 50° N.
Last update : 28/02/2014
    to add your remark
  

 Any use of this site for a publication will be mentioned with the following reference :

Razouls C., de Bovée F., Kouwenberg J. et Desreumaux N., 2005-2014. - Diversity and Geographic Distribution of Marine Planktonic Copepods. Available at http://copepodes.obs-banyuls.fr/en 
[Accessed August 02, 2014]

© copyright 2005-2014 CNRS, UPMC

Webmaster
CNRS   Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls sur Mer - Laboratoire Arago
UPMC - Paris Universitas

 

Version française
English version

 

Search

On the WEB of CNRS

 


Marine Planktonic Copepods

Marine Planktonic Copepods

 

Imprimer Contact Accueil Plan du site Accès restreint Retour Une du Labo Imprimer Contact Plan du site Crédits Téléchargez les Plug-Ins