|
|
 |
|
Calanoida ( Order ) |
|
|
|
Diaptomoidea ( Superfamily ) |
|
|
|
Acartiidae ( Family ) |
|
|
|
Acartia ( Genus ) |
|
|
|
Acanthacartia ( Sub-Genus ) |
|
|
| |
Acartia (Acanthacartia) bifilosa (Giesbrecht, 1881) (F,M) | |
| | | | | | | Syn.: | Dias bifilosus Giesbrecht,1881; Acartia bifilosus : T. Scott, 1892 (p.244, fig.F);
no Acartia bifilosa: Shen & Bai, 1956 (p.224, figs.F,M); Chen & Zhang, 1965 (p.112, figs.F,M); Kim, 1985 (p.137, figs.); Yoo, 1991 (tab.1); Yoo & al., 1991 (p.257, fig.); Myung & al., 1994 (tab.1); Shim & Choi, 1996 (p., figs., tab.); Yoon & al., 1998 (p.923, figs. eggs, Nauplius, juv., F, M, Rem.) | | | | Ref.: | | | Giesbrecht, 1892 (p.507, 522, figs.F,M); Giesbrecht & Schmeil, 1898 (p.153); Steuer, 1923 (p.22, figs.F,M); Gurney, 1931 a (p.230, figs.F,M); Wilson, 1932 a (p.162, figs.F,M); Rose, 1933 a (p.275, figs.F,M); Redeke, 1934 (p.39, fig.F, Rem.); Jespersen, 1940 (p.70); Farran, 1948 a (n°12, p.3, figs.F); Brodsky, 1950 (1967) (p.425, figs.F,M); Crisafi & Crescenti, 1972 (1974) (p.231, figs.F,M, juv.); Brylinski, 1981 (p.257, figs.F, M); Schnack, 1982 (p.89, figs. Mx2, Md, Mxp); Brylinski, 1984 (p.961, figs.M: anomalies); Sazhina, 1985 (p.78, figs.N); Yoo & al., 1991 (p.257, fig.F); Behrends & al., 1997 (p.594, figs.F); Hirst & Castro-Longoria, 1998 (p.1119, figs.F,M, Rem.); Bradford-Grieve, 1999 (N° 181, p.5, figs.F,M); Barthélémy, 1999 (p.857, 864, figs.F); 1999 a (p.9, Fig.23, A, B); Bradford-Grieve & al., 1999 (p.885, 962, figs.F,M); Castro-Longoria & Williams, 1999 (p.215, figs.F,M); Soh & Suh, 2000 (p.322, 332, Rem.); G. Harding, 2004 (p.24, figs.F,M); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.409, figs.F,M, Rem.) |  issued from : J.M. Brylinski in J. Plankton Res., 1981, 3 (2). [Fig.2, p.257]. Structure of P5 of the Acartia in the wet docks of the harbour of Dunkirk (Strait of Dover). Male and Female a: Acartia clausi; b: A. tonsa, c: A. discaudata, d: A. bifilosac.f.: curved finger, c.n.: curved needle, d.t.: distal tooth, l.: lamella, l.p.: lamellar process, p.t.: proximal tooth, s.: setae, sp.: spines, 3, segment 3 of left leg. Rem: P5 = fifth leg
|
 issued from : J.M. Brylinski in J. Plankton Res., 1984, 6 (6). [Fig.3,p.963]. female: various types of anomalies of P5 in the wet docks of the harbour of Dunkirk (Strait of Dover).
Rem: P5 = fifth leg
|
 issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19. [Taf.43, Fig.15]. Female: 15, habitus (dorsal).
|
 issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19. [Taf.43, Fig.23]. Male: 23, P5.
|
 issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19. [Taf.30, Fig.29]. Female: 29, P5.
|
 issued from : P. Crisafi & M. Crescenti in Boll. Pesca Piscic. Idrobiol., 1972 (1974), 27 (2). [p.247, Pl.VII]. Female (from Milazzo Harbour, Sicily): f, habitus (dorsal); f ad, posterior thoracic part and urosome (dorsal); , f P5, P5. Male: m, habitus (dorsal); m ad, posterior thoracic part and urosome (dorsal); m P5, P5.
|
 issued from : R.-M. Bathélémy in J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 1999, 79. [p.861, Fig.4, A-B]. Scanning electron micrograph. Female (from Elson Lagoon, Alaska): A, external ventral view of genital double-somite; B, internal genital area. Scale bars: 0.030 mm (A); 0.020 mm (B). Symbols: * = cuticular protuberance; arrowhead = lamellar flap; small arrow = genital slit; ap = apoderme; sd = seminal duct; sr = seminal repeptacle; ed = egg-laying duct.
|
 issued from : A. Steuer in Arb. zool. Inst. Innsbruck, 1923, 1 (5). [Taf. II, Figs.11, 12]. Female: 11, genital segment (ventral); 12, idem with spermatophore (lateral).
|
 issued from : M. Rose in Result. Camp. Scient. Price Albert Ier, Monaco, 1929, 78. [Pl.III, Figs.8]. As Acartia bifilosa var. inermis. Female (from Loire Estuary and Gorringe Bank, off Gibraltar): Ab D, urosome with spermatophore (dorsal); Ab L, last thoracic segment and urosome (lateral); A1; P1 to P5. Male: D, habitus (dorsal); R, forehead (ventral); Ab L, urosome (lateral; with epibionts on the 4th segment); A1 (right).
|
 issued from : M. Rose in Result. Camp. Scient. Price Albert Ier, Monaco, 1929, 78. [Pl.IV, Figs.8]. Female: Md. Male: Ab D, urosome (dorsal; showing two aspects); A2; P1 to P5.
|
 issued from : J.M. Brylinski in J. Plankton Res., 1984, 6 (6). [Tableau.1, p.964]. Results of the countings of the normal and abnormal animals in samples analyzed to Acartia bifilosa in diferent regions.
|
 issued from : G. Harding in Key to the adullt pelagic calanoid copepods found over the continental shelf of the Canadian Atlantic coast. Bedford Inst. Oceanogr., Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, 2004. [p.24]. Female & Male.
| | | | | Compl. Ref.: | | | Sewell, 1948 (p.367, 419, 483, 487); Conover, 1959 (p.259, Table 1, 2, respiration); M.W. Johnson, 1961 (p.311, Table 2); H. Schulz, 1961 (p.57); Marshall & Orr, 1962 (tab.3); Cannicci, 1962 (p.349, Table3); ? Shih & al., 1971 (p.29, 200); Paulmier, 1971 (p.168); Martens, 1972 (p.15, fecal pellets); Arndt & Heidecke, 1973 (p.599, 603); Eriksson, 1973 a (p.95, fig.10, area abundance distibution); Castel & Lasserre, 1977 (p.129, fig.2, 3, 7); Hernroth, 1978 (p.1, Rem.: p.5); Collins & Williams, 1981 (p.273, monthly distribution-salinity); Castel & Courties, 1982 (p./417, Table II, fig.4, spatial & monthly distribution); Chojnacki, 1983 a (p.435, length-weight relation); Chojnacki & Hussein, 1983 (p.53, Table 3, length-weight); d'Elbée, 1984 (p.24, Fig.3); Lam Hoi & al., 1985 (p.451, 460); Jouffre & al., 1991 (p.489, lagoon); Viitasalo, 1992 (tab.2); Castel, 1993 (p.145, long-term annual distribution); ? Hwang & Choi, 1993 (tab.3); Sellner & al., 1994 (p.249); Irigoien & Castel, 1995 (p.115, productivity); Irigoien & al., 1996 (p.163, gut clearance rate); Marcus, 1996 (p.143); Mauchline, 1998 (tab.18, 35, 40, 47, 61); Belmonte & Potenza, 2001 (p.173); Vieira & al., 2003 b (p.199); Lo & al., 2004 (p.89, tab.1); Katajisto, 2004 (p.751, dormancy eggs); Hsiao & al., 2004 (p.325, tab.1); Lan & al., 2004 (p.332, tab.1, tab.2); Uriarte & Villate, 2005 (p.863, tab.I); David & al., 2005 (p.171); Uriarte & Villate, 2006 (p.565, resting eggs); Hansen F.C. & al., 2006 (p.39, production); Chojnacki & al., 2007 (p.42, Table 2); David & al., 2007 a (p.429, figs.2, 4, 5, Table 3, 4, 5, 6); Youn & Choi, 2007 (p.222: Table1, egg production); Holmborn & Gorokhova, 2008 (p.483); Li J. & al., 2008 (p.95, effects of different diets); Holeton & al., 2009 (p.661, astaxanthin storage); Holmborn, 2009 (p.12); Telesh & al., 2009 (p.18: Table 2.1); Brylinski, 2009 (p.253: Tab.1, p.256: Rem.); Sun & al., 2010 (p.1006, Table 2: Yellow Sea); Mazzocchi & Di Capua, 2010 (p.423); Hsiao S.H. & al., 2011 (p.475, Appendix I); Sun X.-H. & al., 2011 (p.741, figs5.3, 4, tab.I, II, production); Postel, 2012 (p.327, Table 1), Fig.6) | | | | NZ: | 7 + 3 doubtful | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  Chart of 1996 | |
 issued from : P. Martens in M.S. Inst. Meeresk. Christian-Albrechts Univ., 1972. [p.19].
Numbers of fecal pellets (n) by width classes (interval from 0.005 mm).
Nota: individuals in culture on Chaetoceros decipiens, C. socialis, Detonula cystifera, Skeletonema costatum and flagellates.
Mean size of fecal pellets: length = 134 ± 5 micrometers; width = 45 ± 16 micrometers. Volume male = 109335 µ3; female = 316679 µ3. |
 issued from : J. Chojnacki & M.M. Hussein in Zesz. nauk. Akad. Roln. Szczec., 1983, 103. [p.55, Fig.1].
Total length - weight relationship in selected copepod species (copepodites I to V and adults) from the eastern sector of the Southern Baltic Sea.
Animals preserved in 4 % formalin and lengths in different copepodites and adults stages measured under stereomicroscope. Volume et weight calculated according to the simplified formula (Chojnacki & al., 1980). The results in fig. 1 present mean Lt (total length values for different developmental stades (nauplii not examined) by season and area. |
 issued from : J. Chojnacki & M.M. Hussein in Zesz. nauk. Akad. Roln. Szczec., 1983, 103. [p.54].
Total length - weight relationship calculated according to the simplified formula proposed by J. Chojnacki, P. Ciszewski & Z. Witek, 1980). |
 issued from : J. Chojnacki in Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol., 1983, 68 (3). [p.436, Fig.1].
Length-weight relationship determined by geometrical method (Pattern from calanoid-form Pseudocalanus elongatus).
Lc = cephalothorax length; La = urosome length; Lan = antennula length; h : cephalothorax height; Ra = diameter of urosome cross-section; Ran = diameter of antennula cross-section.
A conversion factor of 1.025, reflecting the density (g per cm3) of the coastal Baltic water.
The correlation coefficient for the relationship studied was found to be about 0.96
|
 issued from : N.R. Collins & R. Williams in Mar. Biol., 1981, 64. [p.278, Fig.7];
Acartia bifilosa var. inermis. Monthly distribution and abundance in Bristol Channel and Severn Estuary from November 1973 to February 1975, together with 33.5 p.1000 S isohaline. |
| | | | Loc: | | | Arct. (Mer de Beaufort), Atlant. N, off Woods Hole, Baie de Fundy, Groenland, Islande, Mer du Nord, Norvège, Bristol Channel, Southampton, Manche E, Pas de Calais, Dunkirk Harbour, Zuiderzee, Elbe (estuaire), Bay of Kiel, Gulf of Mecklenburger, Baltic Sea, G. de Finlande, Öregrund Archipelago, G. de Gascogne, Belon estuary, Urdaibai estuary, St.-Jean-de-Luz, Arcachon Bay, Gironde Estuary, Portugal (Mondego Bay), Médit. (Strait of Messina, W Sardinia, Etang de Thau), Mer Noire, ? [Viet-Nam (Baie de Cauda), mers de Chine (Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, East China Sea, South China Sea, Jiaozhou Bay), Taiwan (E, N, NW), Mer Jaune, Corée S, Japon N, Mer d'Okhotsk, Alaska] | | | | N: | 57 (Arct.: 3; Atlant. N.: 17; Manche: 6; Mer du Nord: 2; Baltic: 15; Médit.: 7, Mer Noire: 1; ? Pacif.: 2 | | | | Lg.: | | | (22) F: 1,1; M: 1,1-1; (45) F: 1,25-1; M: 1,25-1; (164) F: 1,1-1,02; (167) F: 0,9-0,77; M: 0,86-0,77; (168) F: 1,241-1,146; M: 1,146-1,071; (284) F: 0,924-0,672; M: 0,854-0,672; (1123) F: 1,119-0,786; M: 1,165-0,667; {F: 0,67-1,25; M: 0,67-1,25} | | | | Rem.: | littoral, coastal, more or less brackish (cf. Sewell, 1948, p.324, 367).
Confusions have been possible with A. hongi described in 2000 for the North Pacific (Seas of China, Corea and Japan).
The presence of A. bifilosa remains to confirm in the Pacific, notably in the Chinese Sea (cf. in Shih & Young, 1995 p.66) in spite of its occurrence in the Bo Hai Sea and in Alaska, indicated by Wang et al. (2002, p. 348). Hsiao S.H. & al. (2011, p.487) confirm the occurrence of this species from east Taiwan.
The 5th leg of female may show anomalies (cf. Behrends & al., 1997).
This species may have been introduced into the Mediterranean and the Black Sea by ballast from ships, or correspond to an ice-age relict.
Acartia bifilosa inermis Rose,1929 (F,M)
Ref.: Rose,1929 (p.48, figs.F,M); 1933 a (p.275, figs.F,M); Trinast,1976 (p.57); Hirst & Castro-Longoria, 1998 (p.1119, figs.F,M, Rem.); Bradford-Grieve, 1999 (N°181, p.5, figs.F,M)
Ref. compl.: Williams & Collins, 1981 (p.273, fig.7, 8, distrinution-salinity); 1985 (p.27); Vieira & al., 2003 b (p.199)
Loc.: Portugal (Mondego Estuary), France : Estuaire de la Loire (St-Nazaire), Gibraltar W, Bristol Channel-Severn Estuary, estuaire de la Forth
Lg.: (325) F: 1,1; M: 1,1 | | | Last update : 20/05/2013 | |
|
|
 Any use of this site for a publication will be mentioned with the following reference :
Razouls C., de Bovée F., Kouwenberg J. et Desreumaux N., 2005-2012. - Diversity and Geographic Distribution of Marine Planktonic Copepods. Available at http://copepodes.obs-banyuls.fr/en
[Accessed May 20, 2013] © copyright 2005-2012 CNRS, UPMC
|
|
|
|
 bifilosa - Plate 1 of morphological figures',750,500);)
 bifilosa - Plate 2 of morphological figures',750,500);)
 bifilosa - Plate 3 of morphological figures',750,500);)
 bifilosa - Plate 4 of morphological figures',750,500);)
 bifilosa - Plate 5 of morphological figures',750,500);)
 bifilosa - Plate 6 of morphological figures',750,500);)
 bifilosa - Plate 7 of morphological figures',750,500);){kind=small}
 bifilosa - Plate 8 of morphological figures',750,500);)
 bifilosa - Plate 9 of morphological figures',750,500);)
 bifilosa - Plate 10 of morphological figures',750,500);)
 bifilosa - Plate 11 of morphological figures',750,500);){kind=small}
 bifilosa - Plate 12 of morphological figures',750,500);)
 bifilosa - Distribution map 3',650,500);)
 bifilosa - Distribution map 4',750,500);)
 bifilosa - Distribution map 5',750,500);)
 bifilosa - Distribution map 6',750,500);)
 bifilosa - Distribution map 7',750,500);)
 bifilosa - Distribution map 8',750,500);)
 bifilosa - Plate 1 of morphological figures){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Plate 2 of morphological figures){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Plate 3 of morphological figures){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Plate 4 of morphological figures){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Plate 5 of morphological figures){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Plate 6 of morphological figures){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Plate 7 of morphological figures){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Plate 8 of morphological figures){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Plate 9 of morphological figures){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Plate 10 of morphological figures){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Plate 11 of morphological figures){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Plate 12 of morphological figures){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Distribution map 3){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Distribution map 4){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Distribution map 5){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Distribution map 6){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Distribution map 7){kind=link}
 bifilosa - Distribution map 8){kind=link}