issued from : E.M. Trinast in Crusraceana, 1976, 31 (1). [p.55, Figs.1-10]. Female (from 33°37'10''N, 117°53'40''W): 1-2, habitus (dorsal and lateral, respectively); 3, forehead (ventral); 4, A1; 5, Md (masticatory edge); 6, P4; 7, P5; 8, idem (lateral); 9, urosome (dorsal); 10, idem (lateral). Scale bars for 1 represents 0.5 mm; those for 5 and 7 = 0.05 mm.
Nota : Rostral filaments long and slender. A1 reacing just beyond end of prosome. Prosome :urosome = about 3.2. Genital segment longer than wide. Ornamentation (presence of spines, hairs or setae variable ; when present, posterolateral margin of last prosome segment armed with 2 small spines on each side, genital segment and suceeding segment with row of minute spinules on posterodorsal margins. Anal segment short, without spines or setae. Caudal rami longer than wide (length : width = about 1.6). Segment 1 of P5 fused medially, segment 2 longer than broad, segment 3 (terminal spine) bulbous posteriorly at base, spinules mimited to central part (distal segment often curved at tip) ; external seta nearly as long as terminal spine.
issued from : E.M. Trinast in Crusraceana, 1976, 31 (1). [p.56, Figs.11-16]. Male: 11, habitus (dorsal); 12, A1; 13, P5 (posterior surface); 14, idem (anterior surface); 15, urosome (dorsal); 16 a, 16b, urosome (lateral). Scla bars: for 11 represents 0.5 mm; those for 13 and 14 = 0.05 mm.
Nota Prosome : urosome = abiut 2.9. A1 extending about to end of last prosome segment. Ornamentation variable, when present, last prosome segment armed with small dorsal spine and several (3-6) more slender, ventral setae . 1st urosomal segment narrower than 2nd ; 2nd, 3rd and 4th urosomal segments each with row of minute spinules on posterodorsal margin ; anal segment not ornamented. Each basal segment of P5 with plumose seta on outer margin; basal segment of right P5 with triangular inner lobe, exopodite 1 with proximal inner lobe bearing small spine, exopodite 3 with a large, bilobed inner projection bearing small spine on distal margin, exopodite 3 outer margin with 3 or more small hairs near curved region, inner margin smooth except for small spine near midpoint, segment terminating in a small spine; left P5 exopodite 1 without spines or seta, exopodite 2-3 terminating in long, blunt apical spine, slightly fexed, sustended by slender, simple accessory spine.
issued from : J.K. Dawson in Harbors Environmental Projects, Univ. Southern California, 1979. [p.10, Fig.4]. Female (from Los Angeles Harbors): P5.
issued from : J.K. Dawson in Harbors Environmental Projects, Univ. Southern California, 1979. [p.8, Fig.2]. Male: P5.
issued from : J.K. Dawson in Harbors Environmental Projects, Univ. Southern California, 1979. [p.15, Fig.9, A, C]. Female: C, urosome (dorsal).
Male: A, urosome (dorsal).
issued from : J.K. Dawson in Harbors Environmental Projects, Univ. Southern California, 1979. [p.4, Table 1]. Differential morphometrics of Acartia californiensis and Acartia tonsa in the Los Angeles Harbors (California).
Nota: 20 females and 20 males of each species were studied. In male, he small digitiform appendages on the left terminal segments of A. tonsa clearly differentiate it from the single large digitiform appendage on the same segment of A. californiensis. Similarly, the presence and absence of a lobe on the 2nd basipodal segment of female A. tonsa and A. californiensis respectively, separate the females of these species. A search for an easily observed and reliable character for differentiating these two species was found fro females in the width to length ratio of the genital segment and for males in the width to length ratio of the 2nd urosomal segment.
Johnson J.K., 1980 (p.568, production & hatching of dormant eggs); Grice & Marcus, 1981 (p.125, Dormant eggs, Rem.: p.131, 135, 136); Brinton & al., 1986 (p.228, Table 1: Rem.); Huntley & Lopez, 1992 (p.201, Table A1, egg-adult weight, temperature-dependent production); Kimmerer, 1993 (tab.2); Marcus, 1996 (p.143); Cordell & al., 1997 (On line pdf); Suarez-Morales & Gasca, 1998 a (p107); Mauchline, 1998 (tab.40, 45, 47, 51, 61); Elliott & Kaufmann, 2007 (p.418); Galbraith, 2009 (pers. comm.); Bollens & al., 2011 (p.1358, Table III, fig.6); Gusmao & al., 2013 (p.279, Table 3, sex-specific predation by fish); in CalCOFI regional list (MDO, Nov. 2013; M. Ohman, pers. comm.)
Distribution map of Acartia (Acanthacartia) californiensis by geographical zones
issued from : J.K. Dawson in Harbors Environmental Projects, Univ. Southern California, 1979. [p.16, Fig.10]. Distribution of A. californiensis and A. tonsa in Los Angeles-Long Beach Harbors, California. November 1978.
Nota: As can be seen from the distribution of the two species, A. californiensis appears to dominate most of the inner habor channels and A. tonsa predominates in the outer harbor. There is an mixing of the two species, probably by tidal action. The strongest and most consistent abiotic differences between the inner and outer harbor are in pH and dissolved oxygen; inner harbor with low pH (7.75) opposed to the outer harbor (8.02) and also a lower dissolved oxygen (6.1 ppm) compared to the outer harbor (8.02 ppm). But whether or not such abiotic characteristics are responsible for the observed distribution of these species is yet to be fully determined.
Salinity from Upper Newport Bay (California) = 31.3-33.1 p.1000.
Last update : 22/09/2014
Any use of this site for a publication will be mentioned with the following reference :
Razouls C., de Bovée F., Kouwenberg J. et Desreumaux N., 2005-2015. - Diversity and Geographic Distribution of Marine Planktonic Copepods. Available at http://copepodes.obs-banyuls.fr/en [Accessed January 29, 2015]