|
|
 |
|
Calanoida ( Order ) |
|
|
|
Clausocalanoidea ( Superfamily ) |
|
|
|
Aetideidae ( Family ) |
|
|
|
Aetideopsis ( Genus ) |
|
|
| |
Aetideopsis armata (Boeck, 1872) (F,M) | |
| | | | | | | Syn.: | Euchaeta armata Boeck, 1872;
Chiridius armatus : Sars, 1901 a (1903) (p.27, figs.F,M); 1925 (p.45); Farran, 1903 (p.15, figs.F); Vanhöffen, 1907 (p.519, figs.F,M); Damas & Koefoed, 1907 (p.398, tab.II, III); Farran, 1908 b (p.30, Rem.); With, 1915 (p.77, figs.F,M); Sars, 1925 (p.45); Farran, 1926 (p.247); Wilson, 1932 a (p.47, figs.F,M); Rose, 1933 a (p.94, figs.F,M); Jespersen, 1934 (p.55, fig.12); 1939 (p.46, Rem., Table 29); 1940 (p.18); Lysholm & al., 1945 (p.11); Sewell, 1948 (p.384, 499); C.B. Wilson, 1950 (p.189, fig.M); Matthews, 1964 (p.6, figs.N, juv., F,M); Elofsson, 1966 (p.92, fig.: eye); Pavlova, 1966 (p.43); Matthews, 1967 (p.159, Table 1, Rem.);Vives, 1967 (p.551, fig.M, tab.III); Vinogradov, 1968 (1970) (p.195); Tanaka & Omori, 1970 (p.114, figs.F); Björnberg, 1972 (p.25, Rem.N); Björnberg, 1973 (p.323, 385); Matthews & Sands, 1973 (p.19, Table 4); Alvarez & Matthews, 1975 (p.67, feeding behaviour, assimilation); Skjoldal & Bamstedt, 1977 (p.197, adenosides); Vives, 1978 a (p.265); Dessier, 1979 (p.204); Kovalev & Schmeleva, 1982 (p.83); Norrbin & Bamstedt, 1984 (p;47, Table 2, 3: calorific value); Pancucci-Papadopoulou & al., 1990 (p.199); Fransz & al., 1991 (p.9); Hanssen, 1997 (tab.3.1); Hure & Krsinic, 1998 (p.46, 101); Mauchline, 1998 (tab.26, 30, 58); Halvorsen & Tande, 1999 (p.279, tab.2, 3, Rem.: p.282); d'Elbée, 2001 (tabl.1); Sameoto & al., 2002 (p.12); Veistheim & al., 2005 (p.382, tab.1, fig.1); Gaard & al., 2008 (p.59, Table 1, N Mid-Atlantic Ridge);
Pseudaetideus armatus (Boeck,1872): Wolfenden, 1904 (p.115); Pearson, 1906 (p.11); Pesta, 1920 (p.509); Brodsky, 1950 (1967) (p.157, figs.F,M); Vervoort, 1952 c (n°44, p.3, figs.F,M); Østvedt, 1955 (p.14: Table 3, p.60); Vervoort, 1963 b (p.125, Rem.); Grice & Hulsemann, 1965 (p.223); Mazza, 1965 a (p.310, figs. juv.F,M, F, Rem.); 1966 (p.70); 1967 (p.119, 139, figs.juv., F,M); 1968 (p.531, figs.); Grice, 1969 a (p.454); Gamulin, 1971 (p.382, tab.3); Roe, 1972 (p.277, tabl.1, tabl.2); Scotto di Carlo & Ianora, 1983 (p.150); Scotto di Carlo & al., 1984 (p.1044); Scotto di Carlo & al., 1991 (p.270); Mumm, 1993 (tab.1);
Pseudoaetideus armatus : Park, 1970 (p.476); Kovalev & Schmeleva, 1982 (p.83) | | | | Ref.: | | | Bradford, 1969 (p.94, Rem.); 1969 b (p.502); Park, 1975 b (p.276, figs.F,M); Bradford & Jillett, 1980 (p.19); Markhaseva, 1996 (p.27, figs.F,M); Yamaguchi & al., 2005 (p.835, Tabl. VIII); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.537, figs.F,M, Rem.) |  issued from : E.L. Markhaseva in Trudy Zool. Inst. RAN, St. Petersburg, 1996, 268. [p.29, Fig.14]. Female (from SE Pacif.). Different specimens.
|
 issued from : E.L. Markhaseva in Trudy Zool. Inst. RAN, St. Petersburg, 1996, 268. [p.30, Fig.15]. Female (from SE Pacif.).
|
 issued from : T. Park in Bull. Mar. Sci., 1975, 25 (2). [p.277, Fig.3] Female (from Gulf of Mexico): a, b, habitus (dorsal, lateral, respectively); c, d, posterior part of metasome and urosome (dorsal, lateral, respectively); e, forehead, (lateral); f, rostrum (anterior); g, A2; h, Md; i, Mx1; j, P1; k, P2; l, P3. P1-3: legs (anterior).
|
 issued from : T. Park in Bull. Mar. Sci., 1975, 25 (2). [p.278, Fig.4] Male (from Gulf of Mexico): a, b, habitus (dorsal, lateral, respectively); c, forehead (lateral); d, e, posterior part of metasome and urosome (dorsal, lateral); f, rostrum (anterior); g, A2; h, mandibular palp of Md; i, Mx1; j, Mxp; k, P1; l, P2; m, P5 (posterior); P1-2: legs (anterior; P5: fifth pair of legs.
|
 issued from : G.O. Sars in An Account of the Crustacea of Norway. Vol. IV. Copepoda Calanoida. Published by the Bergen Museum, 1903. [Pl. XV]. As Chiridius armatus. Female & Male. Nota: R = rostrum; M = Md; m = Mx1; mp1 = Mx2. Nota Female: Front narrowly rounded and armed below with a very small bifid rostrum. Eye unusually large and distinctly bilobate, dark red in colour. Exopod of A2 about 1/3 longer than endopod. P1 with a well-marked setiform spine outside the 1st segment of the exopod. P2 with endopod distinctly biarticulate. Nota Male: A1 (23-segmented) considerably shorter than in female, not nearly as long as the prosome, and somewhat incrassated at the base. mandibular palps much more strongly built than in female, with endopod well developed and carrying at the tip very coarse diverging setae. Right P5 stronger than the left, both with a very small uniarticulate appendage inside the 2nd segment, representing a rudiment of endopod
|
 issued from : G.O. Sars in An Account of the Crustacea of Norway. Vol. IV. Copepoda Calanoida. Published by the Bergen Museum, 1903. [Pl. XVI]. Female & Male. M = Md; m = Mx1; mp1 = Mx2; mp2 = Mxp.
|
 Issued from : K.A. Brodskii in Calanoida of the Far Eastern Seas and Polar Basin of the USSR. Opred. Fauna SSSR, 1950, 35 (Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1967) [p.156, Fig.70]. As Pseudaetideus armatus. Female (from Arctic): habitus (dorsal and lateral left side); R, rostrum. Nota: Cephalothorax 2.5 times length of abdomen. Eye very large. Spikes of terminal thoracic segment slightly asymmetrical, right one larger than left, both parallel, reaching to middle of genital segment. Male: S5, P5. Nota: A1 23-segmented.
|
 issued from : G.P. Farran in Qcient. Invest. Fish. Brch, Ireland, 1901 (2), Appendix 7, 1903. [Plate XVI, Figs.1-2, 4-5, 8-12]. As Chiridius armatus. Female (from off Cleggan, Irelandl): 1-2, habitus (lateral and dorsal, respectively); 4, A2; 5, Md (mandibular palp); 8, Mx1 (lower lobes omitted); 9, Mxp; 10, Mx2; 11, P2 (anterior).
|
 issued from : G.P. Farran in Qcient. Invest. Fish. Brch, Ireland, 1901 (2), Appendix 7, 1903. [Plate XVI, Fig.3]. As Chiridius armatus. Female: 3, A1.
|
 issued from : G.P. Farran in Qcient. Invest. Fish. Brch, Ireland, 1901 (2), Appendix 7, 1903. [Plate XVI, Figs.6, 7, 13]. As Chiridius armatus. Female: 6, Md (cutting edge); 7, P1 (anterior); 13, P4 (posterior).
|
 issued from : G.P. Farran in Qcient. Invest. Fish. Brch, Ireland, 1901 (2), Appendix 7, 1903. [Plate XVI, Fig.12]. As Chiridius armatus. Female: 12, P3 (anterior).
|
 issued from : G.D. Grice & T.J. Lawson in Crustaceana, 1971, 21 (1). [Pl.1]. Teeth of the mandible. Upper figure drawn with the aid of a camera lucida; lower figure an electron-micrograph of the appendage fixed in formalin, freeze dried and gold-coated. Nota: In the upper figure gross structure is readily discernible; however, the type configuration and shape of the teeth which arise from gnathobase are difficult to interpret. The Scanning electron microscope (SEM) permits to examine appendage at a higher level of resolution and with a much greater depth of field. It also suggests a difference in structure or texture between the teeth proper and the remainder of the mandibular blade (gnathobase).
|
 issued from : C. With in The Danish Ingolf-Expedition, 1915, III (4). [p.77, Text-Fig.17]. As Chiridius armatus. Female (NE Atlantic): a, head (dorsal); b, forehead (lateral); c, last thoracic segments and genital segment (dorsal); d, lateral corner and genital segment (left side); e, parasite attached to the right Mx2.
|
 issued from : C. With in The Danish Ingolf-Expedition, 1915, III (4). [Pl.II, Fig.3, b-d]. As Chiridius armatus. Female: b, labrum (oral view); g2-g4 the 2nd and 4th groups of the lateral longitudinal series . Sa the 4th central circular spot. c, lamina labialis and serrulae 6-teeth. d, area labialis and postlabialis. Nota: The anterior surface of the labrum has, in addition to the usual marginal row of setae which are fairly slender in the middle and more like granules laterally, in the middle a transverse row of laterally shorter setae, and in front on each side a group of short setae, and in front on each side a group of short setae. The oral surface of the labrum is characteristic, in front of the chitinous transverse bar behind the median central spot Nr.3, a transverse row of short setae is found, around and behind the median spot 4 (S4) short setae are placed in transverse rows; the skin is everywhere, especially posteriorly, minutely granular; the lateral longitudinal series consists as usual of 5 groups, the two first groups are placed somewhat longitudinally, are distinctly longer than wide, and consist of short spinules, most like granules; the groups 3-5, in contrast, less well separated, and consist of an inner row of longer and an irregular, outer group of scatterad shorter hairs The laminan labialis is in the shape of the dentations almost smooth; the arrangement of the groups of hairs in front and behind the lamina labialis corresponds to a series of bristles on the labial lobes (see 3d).
|
 issued from : C. With in The Danish Ingolf-Expedition, 1915, III (4). [Pl.II, Fig.3, a]. As Chiridius armatus. Female: 3a, P2 (anterior view). Nota: 1 glandular pore (formed by a chitinous ring, in the middle of which a generally longitudinal split is seen) on the outer surface of exopod 1, 2 on exopodite 2 and 3 on exopod 3.
|
 issued from : R. Elofsson in Sarsia, 1966, 25. [p.92, Fig62]. . (from Bergen, Norway): Semi-diagrammatic drawing from sections showing a sagittal view of the nauplius eye with nerves, the X-organ and the organ of Gicklhorn. 1 = Gicklhorn's organ; 2 = dorsal part of the dorsal lateral nerve; 3 = ventral part of the same nerve; 4 = X-organ; 5 = Ventral medial nerve. Nota: The naupliar eye has 3 cups, one directed ventrally, and two laterally. The lateral cups are much larger than the ventral one and the sensory cells have undergone radical histological changes. Moreover, there is a new element besides the pigment, taperal and sensory cells, viz. 2 lens cells in each cup. The whole eye lies at some distance from the brain, not far from the anterior surface of the animal.
| | | | | Compl. Ref.: | | | Brenning, 1983 (p.2, Rem.); 1985 a (p.28, Table 2); Roe, 1984 (p.356); Heinrich, 1990 (p.16); Kosobokova & al., 1998 (tab.2); Holmes, 2001 (p.44); Lo & al., 2004 (p.89, tab.1); Kosobokova & al., 2007 (p.929: Tab.7); Darnis & al., 2008 (p.994, Table 1); Mazzocchi & Di Capua, 2010 (p.423); | | | | NZ: | 14 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Loc: | | | Atlant. (Afr. NW), G. de Guinée, Sénégal, off Mauritanie, Mer des Antilles, Mer des Sargasses, Bermudes, Açores, off Woods Hole, off Nova Scotia, Baie de Baffin, Détr. de Davis S, SE Greenland, Islande, Mer de Norvège, W Norway (Korsfjorden, Raunefjorden: all the year), Kosterfjorden, Nordvestbanken, Ecosse N, Nansen Basin, SE Beaufort Sea, Mer de Barents, Mer de Laptev, Mer du Nord, Irlande W, G. de Gascogne, off Cap Finisterre W, Baie Ibero-marocaine, Médit. (Mer d'Alboran, Baie d'Alger, Médit. W, Ligurian Sea, Tyrrhenian Sea, Adriatique, Ionienne, Mer Egée, bassin Levantin), Indien NW, Philippines, mers de Chine (East China Sea),Taiwan (N: Mienhua Canyon), Japon, Galapagos (in C.B. Wilson, 1950; Heinrich, 1990), Pacif. SE (tropic.), Chili | | | | N: | 37 | | | | Lg.: | | | (7) F: 4,43-3,6; M: 3,66; (14) F: 3,6-3,2; (22) F: 4,2-3,3; M: 4-2,9; (37) F: 4,5-3,28; M: 4-3,28; (38) F: 3,6-3,2; (45) F: 4; M: 4; (65) F: 4; M: ± 4; (89) F: 4; (113) F: 4-3,33; (197) F: 3,48-3,28; M: 3,4-3,28; (199) F: 3,32-3,04; (207) F: 3,2-2,8; (260) F: 3,2-2,8; (449) F: 4-3,3; M: 4-3,5; (1109) F:3,5;5{F: 3,04-4,50; M: 2,90-4,00} | | | | Rem.: | epi- to bathypelagic.
After Alvarez & Matthews (1975) this species is an active predator, except the male with reduced mouth-parts. In experiments, cannibalism was also observed. | | | Last update : 16/05/2013 | |
|
|
 Any use of this site for a publication will be mentioned with the following reference :
Razouls C., de Bovée F., Kouwenberg J. et Desreumaux N., 2005-2012. - Diversity and Geographic Distribution of Marine Planktonic Copepods. Available at http://copepodes.obs-banyuls.fr/en
[Accessed May 19, 2013] © copyright 2005-2012 CNRS, UPMC
|
|
|
|
;)
;)
;)
;)
;)
;)
;)
;)
;){kind=small}
;)
;)
;)
;)
;)
;)
;)
