New version of the site! The interface has just been modernized — tell us what you think by email or rate it : ★★★★★ ★★★★★
Marine Planktonic Copepods
Oncaea pumilis  Heron, 1977   (F,M)
Taxonomy
Order Cyclopoida
Family Oncaeidae

References

Heron, 1977 (p.75, Descr.F, figs.F); Heron & al.,1984 (p.472, Descr.M, figs.F,M,); Malt & al., 1989 (p.957, Rem.M, figs.M); Böttger-Schnack & Schnack, 2009 (p.131, Table 5: p.140: Rem.); Vives & Shmeleva, 2010 (p.322, figs.F,M, Rem.)

Figures

Plate 1 issued from : G.A. Heron in Antarct. Res. Ser. Washington, 1977, 26. [p.76, Fig.23, h-u].
Female (from SW Pacific-Antarctic area): h, habitus (lateral; scale bar: X); i, posterior of last prosomal segment and urosome (lateral; scale bar: Y); j, urosome (dorsal; lacking caudal setae; scale bar: Y); k, left A2 (lacking proximal spine on terminal segment; scale bar: Y); l, labrum (scale bar: Z); m, right Md (scale bar: Z); n, right Mx1 (scale bar: Z); o, right Mx2 (scale bar: Z); p, right Mxp (scale bar: Y); q-t, P1 to P4 (scale bar: Y); u, P5 (scale bar: Z).
Plate 2 issued from : G.A. Heron, T.S. English & D.M. Damkaer in J. Crustacean Biol., 1984, 4 (3). [p.471, Fig.12, D-J].
Female (from Arctic): D, anal segment and caudal rami (scale bar: w); E, left A2 (scale bar: v).

Male: F, habitus (lateral; scale bar: v); G-H, posterior of last prosomal segment and urosome (lateral, dorsal, respectively; scale bar: w); I, left Mxp (scale bar: x); J, P5 (scale bar: x).

Complementary References

Razouls & al., 2000 (p.343, tab. 4, Appendix)

Distribution

Localisations

Antarctic (SW Pacif.), ? E Medit. (Lebanon), Norwegian Sea, Arctic

Quotations

N: 3

Dimensions (mm)

(675) F: 0,6-0,5; M: 0,56-0,46; (679) F: 0,52; 0,51; (697) M: 0,48; {F: 0,50-0,60; M: 0,46-0,56}

Remarks

Sampling depth (Antarct.) : 1000-2000 m.
The geographical distribution of this species is surprising.
The comparison of the male figures by Heron and those by Malt does not appear quite convincing.
For Heron & al. (1984, p.472), the male may be separated from other species by the comparatively slender genital segment (seen in lateral view), and the long anal segment and caudal ramus relative to the preceding orosomal segments. The prosomes of many specimens were abnormally expanded, prsumably deformed by internal cystic growth.
Last update : 27/01/2015

Contributor Remarks

 to add your remark