New version of the site! The interface has just been modernized — tell us what you think by email or rate it : ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ …
Marine Planktonic Copepods
Pseudodiaptomus forbesi  Poppe & Richard, 1890   (F,M)
Taxonomy
Order Calanoida
Superfamily Diaptomoidea
Family Pseudodiaptomidae
Genus Pseudodiaptomus

Synonymy

Schmackeria forbesi Poppe & Richard, 1890 (p.396, figs.F,M); Marsh, 1933 (p.44, figs.F,M); Shen & Tai, 1962 (p.101, Rem.).

References

Burchardt, 1913, (p.380, fig.F, M: 11E, 12H, Rem. p.392: phylogeny); Sewell, 1948 (p.421); Shen & Lee, 1963 (p.577); Walter, 1986 (p.132); 1986 a (p.503); 1987 (p.367); Orsi & Walter, 1991 (p.553, figs.F,M)

Figures

Plate 1 Issued from : C.D. Marsh in Proc. U.S. natn. Mus., 1933, 82 (18) (2959). [Pl. 21, figs.5, 7]. As Schmackeria forbesi.
Female (from Yangtze Kiang): 5, P5; 7, urosome with egg sac (dorsal).
Plate 2 Issued from : C.D. Marsh in Proc. U.S. natn. Mus., 1933, 82 (18) (2959). [Pl. 22, fig.4]. As Schmackeria forbesi. After Burckhardt, 1913.
Male: 4, P5.

Complementary References

Ohtsuka & al., 1995 (p.159); Cordell & al., 1997 (p.2, invasive species); Mauchline, 1998 (p.507); Choi & al., 2005 (p.710: Tab.III); Humphrey, 2008 (p.64, 84: Appendix A); Ohtsuka & al., 2008 (p.115, Table 6); Cordell & al., 2008 (p.753); Bollens & al., 2011 (p.1358, Table III, fig.8); DiBacco & al., 2012 (p.483, Table S1, ballast water transport); Bollens & al., 2012 (p.101, fig.2, Table 1, species competition); Kimmerer & al., 2014 (p.722, reproduction , growth vs food); Sabia & al., 2015 (p.460, Table 3, Rem.)

Distribution

NZ: 3

Distribution map of Pseudodiaptomus forbesi by geographical zones


Additional Maps & Charts

Map 3 Chart of 1996
Map 4 Issued from : M. Winder, A.D. Jassby & R.M. Nally in Ecology Letters, 2011, 14. [p.753, Fig.3, d].
Historical abundances of introduced species in the upper San Francisco Estuary between 1972 and 2009.
Adult stages are shown because immature stages were not continuously identified.
Pseudodiaptomus spp. is dominated by P. forbesi, whereas P. marinus contributed in small numbers.

Localisations

China Seas (East China Sea, South China Sea, Yangtze-Kiang Riv.), Japan, California, San Francisco Estuary

Quotations

N: 12

Dimensions (mm)

(1062) F: 1,20-1,35; M: 1,20; {F: 1,20-1,35; M: 1,20}

Remarks

Incomplete data.
In Lobus species group (forbesi subgroup) after Walter & al. 2006, p.203.
Form collected originally in fresh water near Shanghai, transported in ships ballasts to California (Sacramento Estuary).
According to Cordell & al., 2008 (p.753) the 1st record of this species in San Francisco estuary is 1987 and in Columbia River 2002.
ForBollens & al (2012) three non-indigenous species (of which P. forbesi) and two native planktonic copepods (Eurytemora affinis, Diacyclops thomasi) to co-occur and overlap to varying degrees in their distributions in the lower Columbia River estuary suggesting strong potential for competition. It is necessary to distinguish between the relative importance of biological ( competition and predation) and physico-chemical processes (freshwater runoff, eutrophisation) in regulating the dtnamics of native and non-indigenous copepods.
Last update : 02/09/2019

Contributor Remarks

 to add your remark