Plate 1 issued from : R.B.S. Sewell in Fauna of the Chilka Lake, 1924, 12. [Pl. XLV, Fig.1]. Male.
Plate 2 Issued from : C.D. Marsh in Proc. U.S. natn. Mus., 1933, 82 (18) (2959). [Pl. 22, figs.4, 7-8]. As Schmackeria lobipes. After Gurney, 1907. Female: 4, P5.
Male: 7, right P5; 8, left P5.
Plate 3 Issued from : T. C. Walter in Hydrobiologia, 1994, 292/293. [p.125, Fig.1]. Female (from Calcutta, India): A, habitus (dorsal view); B, pedigerous somite 5 and urosome (right lateral view); C, forehead with rostrum (ventral view); D, urosome segment 1 genitalfield (ventral view); E, tip of left caudal ramus showing narrow normal setae; F, P5 (anterior view).
Plate 4 Issued from : T. C. Walter in Hydrobiologia, 1994, 292/293. [p.128, Table 2]. Morphological features of Pseudodiaptomus lobipes from India. Compare with the two species P. binghami and mixtus.
Plate 5 Issued from : T. C. Walter in Hydrobiologia, 1994, 292/293. [p.128, Table 1]. Pseudodiaptomus lobipes from India: Sex, number of specimens measured, total body length range, mean total body length, mean prosome length, mean urosome length and prosome/urosome ratio of lengths. Compare with the three species in India P. binghami and mixtus.
() F: 0,35 *; M: 0,95; (1190) F: 1,29-1,33; M: 0,95-0,98; {F: 1,29-1,33; M: 0,95-0,98} * Measurement for the female given by Gurney probably incorrect (possibly 1.35 mm).
Remarks
freshwater, estuary. Incomplete data. In Lobus species group (forbesi subgroup) after Walter & al. 2006, p.203. Walter (1994, p.124) notes the confusion about the identity of P. lobipes and P. binghami discussed by Reddy & Radhakrishna (1982). The original illustrations of P. lobipes lack many details.
;)
;)
;)
;)
;){kind=small}
