|
|
Famille
Epacteriscidae Fosshagen,1973; emend.: Fosshagen, Boxshall & Iliffe, 2001
Ref.:
Fosshagen, 1973 (p.146); Razouls, 1982 (p.595); Bowman & Abele, 1982 (p.9); Barr, 1984 (p.160, Rev., emend.); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 1985 (p.346, Rev.); Park, 1986 (p.192, Rem.); Huys & Boxshall, 1991 (p.406, 419); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Bradford-Grieve, 1999 b (p.25, Def.); Jaume & Humphreys, 2001 (p.157, Genera key, Rem.); Ohtsuka & Huys, 2001 (p.461); Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.246, Rem., Genera Key, Phylogeny); Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 (p.14; 49; 111: Def.; p. 112: key of genera); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.992); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.73, Rem.: p.89, Genera Key: p.91); Blanco-Bercial & al., 2011 (p.103, Fig.3, molecular biology, phylogeny); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 528: Rem. Table 1, fig.11, cladistic analysis)
Bradford-Grieve J.M., (2002 onwards). Key to calanoid copepod families. Version 1 : 2 oct 2002. http://www.crustacea.net/crustace/calanoida/index.htm
Bradford-Grieve J.M., (2002 onwards). Key to calanoid copepod families. Version 1 : 2 oct 2002. http://www.crustacea.net/crustace/calanoida/index.htm
Rem.:
Pour Fosshagen (1973), la position de cette famille est malaisée à situer. L'auteur l'inclut initialement dans la superfamille des Centropagina (Gurney,1931) mais souligne certains caractères qui les rapprochent des Arietellidae, des Ridgewayiidae, voire des Augaptilidae. Il apparait difficile de faire le partage entre convergences anatomiques dues au mode de vie et relations phylogénétiques.
Formes hyperbenthiques et de grottes sous-marines.
Genre type: Epacteriscus Fosshagen, 1973.
19 G.: Azygonectes, Balinella, Bofuriella, Bomburiella, Bunderia, Caiconectes, Cryptonectes, Edaxiella, Enantiosis, Enantronia, Enantronoides, Epacteriscus, Erebonectes, Erebonectoides, Gloinella, Iboyella, Miheptneria, Minnonectes, Oinella.
D'après Bradford-Grieve & al. (2014, p.528) les genres inclus dans cette famille sont: Balinella, Bofuriella, Bomburiella, Bunderia, Cryptonectes, Edaxiella, Enantiosis, Enantronia, Enantronoides, Epacteriscus, Erebonectes, Gloinella, Iboyella, Mikheptneria, Minnonectes, Oinella. Total: 15 genres.
Formes hyperbenthiques et de grottes sous-marines.
Genre type: Epacteriscus Fosshagen, 1973.
19 G.: Azygonectes, Balinella, Bofuriella, Bomburiella, Bunderia, Caiconectes, Cryptonectes, Edaxiella, Enantiosis, Enantronia, Enantronoides, Epacteriscus, Erebonectes, Erebonectoides, Gloinella, Iboyella, Miheptneria, Minnonectes, Oinella.
D'après Bradford-Grieve & al. (2014, p.528) les genres inclus dans cette famille sont: Balinella, Bofuriella, Bomburiella, Bunderia, Cryptonectes, Edaxiella, Enantiosis, Enantronia, Enantronoides, Epacteriscus, Erebonectes, Gloinella, Iboyella, Mikheptneria, Minnonectes, Oinella. Total: 15 genres.
Figures
Planche 1
Issued from : J.M. Bradford-Grieve, G.A. Boxshall & L. Blanco-Bercial in Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 2014, 171. [p.525, Fig.11].
Strict consensus of one tree after one round of successive weighting. Clade numbers above the line. The out-group is Disseta palumbii Giesbrecht, 1889.
Issued from : J.M. Bradford-Grieve, G.A. Boxshall & L. Blanco-Bercial in Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 2014, 171. [p.525, Fig.11].
Strict consensus of one tree after one round of successive weighting. Clade numbers above the line. The out-group is Disseta palumbii Giesbrecht, 1889.
Planche 2
Issued from : J.M. Bradford-Grieve, G.A. Boxshall & L. Blanco-Bercial in Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 2014, 171. [p.528, Table 7].
Spine and seta formulae of swimming legs in Epacteriscidae.
Roman numerals = robust setae; Arabic numerals = setae. Outer border setation listed in first in each segmental group, and separated by ;
Issued from : J.M. Bradford-Grieve, G.A. Boxshall & L. Blanco-Bercial in Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 2014, 171. [p.528, Table 7].
Spine and seta formulae of swimming legs in Epacteriscidae.
Roman numerals = robust setae; Arabic numerals = setae. Outer border setation listed in first in each segmental group, and separated by ;
Planche 3
Issued from : G.A. Boxshall & S.H. Halsey in An Introduction to Copepod Diversity. The Ray Society, 2004, No 166, Part. I. [p.111].
Armature formula of swimming legs P1 to P4 and P5 female (f).
Nota: Female P5 comprising 3-segmented protopod retaining hoop-like vestige of praecoxa laterally, and 3-segmented rami; setation sometimes reduced.
- Male P5 asymmetrical; both legs typically with 3-segmented rami; exopod 2-segmented due to fusion of 2nd and 3rd segments fused on left side in Epacteriscus. Endopods similar to those of female with armature 0-1; 0-1; 2,2,2; slightly transformed in some genera. Exopods usually highly transformed; most complex structures usually present on left exopod; modified with a slender spiniform distal segment, long and curved on right side in Erebonectes and Enanttiosis.
Issued from : G.A. Boxshall & S.H. Halsey in An Introduction to Copepod Diversity. The Ray Society, 2004, No 166, Part. I. [p.111].
Armature formula of swimming legs P1 to P4 and P5 female (f).
Nota: Female P5 comprising 3-segmented protopod retaining hoop-like vestige of praecoxa laterally, and 3-segmented rami; setation sometimes reduced.
- Male P5 asymmetrical; both legs typically with 3-segmented rami; exopod 2-segmented due to fusion of 2nd and 3rd segments fused on left side in Epacteriscus. Endopods similar to those of female with armature 0-1; 0-1; 2,2,2; slightly transformed in some genera. Exopods usually highly transformed; most complex structures usually present on left exopod; modified with a slender spiniform distal segment, long and curved on right side in Erebonectes and Enanttiosis.
Planche 4
Issued from : G.A. Boxshall & S.H. Halsey in An Introduction to Copepod Diversity. The Ray Society, 2004, No 166, Part. I. [p.113, Fig.21].
Epacteriscidae. A, Erebonectes nesioticus habitus male; B, A1; C, A2; D, Epacteriscus rapax habitus female; E, P5. [Fosshagen & Iliffe, 1985: A; Huys & Boxshall, 1991: B-C, E; Fosshagen, 1973: D]
Issued from : G.A. Boxshall & S.H. Halsey in An Introduction to Copepod Diversity. The Ray Society, 2004, No 166, Part. I. [p.113, Fig.21].
Epacteriscidae. A, Erebonectes nesioticus habitus male; B, A1; C, A2; D, Epacteriscus rapax habitus female; E, P5. [Fosshagen & Iliffe, 1985: A; Huys & Boxshall, 1991: B-C, E; Fosshagen, 1973: D]
Genre
Ref.:
Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2004 (p.119); 2007 (p.80: emendation, 91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis)
Rem.:
Total: 2 spp.
Bradford-Grieve & al. (2014, p.530) considèrent ce genre , après analyse phylogénétique, comme de placement incertain dans cette famille.
Bradford-Grieve & al. (2014, p.530) considèrent ce genre , après analyse phylogénétique, comme de placement incertain dans cette famille.
Genre
Ref.:
Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.292, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 529: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11)
Rem.:
Total: 1 sp.
Genre
Ref.:
Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.286, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.85: emendation, p.92)
Rem.:
3 spp.:
Genre
Ref.:
Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.282, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.92); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis)
Rem.:
Total: 1 sp.
Genre
Ref.:
Jaume & Humphreys (p.158, 168); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.92); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis)
Rem.:
Toyal: 1 sp. :
Genre
Ref.:
Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.74, 91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 530, Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11).
Rem.:
Total: 1 sp.
Bradford-Grieve & al. (2014, p.530) considèrent ce genre , après analyse phylogénétique, comme de place incertaine dans cette famille.
Bradford-Grieve & al. (2014, p.530) considèrent ce genre , après analyse phylogénétique, comme de place incertaine dans cette famille.
Genre
Ref.:
Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2004 (p.122); 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis)
Rem.:
Total: 1 sp.:
Genre
Ref.:
Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.247, 316); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.92); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis)
Rem.:
Total: 1 sp.:
Genre
Ref.:
Barr, 1984 (p.161); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 1985 (p.346); Huys & Boxshall, 1991 (p.62, 63); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Mauchline, 1998 (p.70: F; p.73: M; comme Enantiosus); Bradford-Grieve, 1999 b (p.26, Def.); Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.258, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.92); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis)
Rem.:
Total: 7 spp.:
Remarques sur les dimensions et le sex-ratio
The mean female size is 1.328 mm (n = 11, SD = 0.115), and the mean male size is 1.235 mm (n = 13, SD = 0.085). The size ratio male: female is 0.923.
Genre
Ref.:
Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.251, 316); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.993); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis)
Rem.:
Total: 1 sp.:
Figures
Genre
Ref.:
Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.255, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis)
Rem.:
Total: 1 sp.:
Genre
(12) Epacteriscus Fosshagen,1973; emend. Fosshagen, Boxshall & Iliffe, 2001Espèces, variétés et détails 
Ref.:
Fosshagen, 1973 (p.146); Huys & Boxshall, 1991 (p.53); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Mauchline, 1998 (p.68); Bradford-Grieve, 1999 b (p.26, Déf.); Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.276, 316, Rem.); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis)
Rem.:
type: Epacteriscus rapax. Total: 3 spp.
Figures
Genre
(13) Erebonectes Fosshagen,1985; emend. Fosshagen, Boxshall & Iliffe, 2001Espèces, variétés et détails 
Ref.:
Fosshagen & Iliffe, 1985 (p.346); Huys & Boxshall, 1991(p.50, 51); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Mauchline, 1998 (p.67); Bradford-Grieve, 1999 b (p.26, Déf.); Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.291, 316, Rem.); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis)
Rem.:
Total: 1 sp.:
Figures
Genre
Ref.:
Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.291, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve, 2014 (p.507, 530, fig.9, 10, 11)
Rem.:
1 sp.
Bradford-Grieve & al. (2014, p.530) considèrent ce genre, après analyse phylogénétique, comme de place incertaine dans cette famille.
Bradford-Grieve & al. (2014, p.530) considèrent ce genre, après analyse phylogénétique, comme de place incertaine dans cette famille.
Genre
Ref.:
Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.301, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.92); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis)
Rem.:
Total: 1 sp.:
Genre
Ref.:
Boxshall & Jaume, 2003 (p.86); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.92); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis)
Rem.:
Total: 1 sp.
Genre
Ref.:
Andronov, 2007 (p.672); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis)
Rem.:
Type: Miheptneria abyssalis. Total: 1sp.
Genre
Ref.:
Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2004 (p.128: male diagnosis); 2007 (p.88: female diagnosis, p.92); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 529: Rem., Table 1, Fig. 9, 10, 11)
Rem.:
Total: 1 sp.:
Genre
Ref.:
Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.297, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2004 (p.132); 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis)
Rem.:
Total: 1 sp.:


