|
|
Calanoida ( Ordre ) |
|
|
Epacteriscoidea ( Superfamille ) |
|
|
| |
| | | |
Epacteriscidae Fosshagen,1973; emend.: Fosshagen, Boxshall & Iliffe, 2001 ( Epacteriscoidea ) | Ref.: | Fosshagen, 1973 (p.146); Razouls, 1982 (p.595); Bowman & Abele, 1982 (p.9); Barr, 1984 (p.160, Rev., emend.); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 1985 (p.346, Rev.); Park, 1986 (p.192, Rem.); Huys & Boxshall, 1991 (p.406, 419); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Bradford-Grieve, 1999 b (p.25, Def.); Jaume & Humphreys, 2001 (p.157, Genera key, Rem.); Ohtsuka & Huys, 2001 (p.461); Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.246, Rem., Genera Key, Phylogeny); Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 (p.14; 49; 111: Def.; p. 112: key of genera); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.992); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.73, Rem.: p.89, Genera Key: p.91); Blanco-Bercial & al., 2011 (p.103, Fig.3, molecular biology, phylogeny); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 528: Rem. Table 1, fig.11, cladistic analysis) Bradford-Grieve J.M., (2002 onwards). Key to calanoid copepod families. Version 1 : 2 oct 2002. http://www.crustacea.net/crustace/calanoida/index.htm | Rem.: | Pour Fosshagen (1973), la position de cette famille est malaisée à situer. L'auteur l'inclut initialement dans la superfamille des Centropagina (Gurney,1931) mais souligne certains caractères qui les rapprochent des Arietellidae, des Ridgewayiidae, voire des Augaptilidae. Il apparait difficile de faire le partage entre convergences anatomiques dues au mode de vie et relations phylogénétiques. Formes hyperbenthiques et de grottes sous-marines. Genre type: Epacteriscus Fosshagen, 1973. 19 G.: Azygonectes, Balinella, Bofuriella, Bomburiella, Bunderia, Caiconectes, Cryptonectes, Edaxiella, Enantiosis, Enantronia, Enantronoides, Epacteriscus, Erebonectes, Erebonectoides, Gloinella, Iboyella, Miheptneria, Minnonectes, Oinella. D'après Bradford-Grieve & al. (2014, p.528) les genres inclus dans cette famille sont: Balinella, Bofuriella, Bomburiella, Bunderia, Cryptonectes, Edaxiella, Enantiosis, Enantronia, Enantronoides, Epacteriscus, Erebonectes, Gloinella, Iboyella, Mikheptneria, Minnonectes, Oinella. Total: 15 genres. | Issued from : J.M. Bradford-Grieve, G.A. Boxshall & L. Blanco-Bercial in Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 2014, 171. [p.525, Fig.11]. Strict consensus of one tree after one round of successive weighting. Clade numbers above the line. The out-group is Disseta palumbii Giesbrecht, 1889. |
Issued from : J.M. Bradford-Grieve, G.A. Boxshall & L. Blanco-Bercial in Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 2014, 171. [p.528, Table 7]. Spine and seta formulae of swimming legs in Epacteriscidae. Roman numerals = robust setae; Arabic numerals = setae. Outer border setation listed in first in each segmental group, and separated by ; |
Issued from : G.A. Boxshall & S.H. Halsey in An Introduction to Copepod Diversity. The Ray Society, 2004, No 166, Part. I. [p.111]. Armature formula of swimming legs P1 to P4 and P5 female (f). Nota: Female P5 comprising 3-segmented protopod retaining hoop-like vestige of praecoxa laterally, and 3-segmented rami; setation sometimes reduced. - Male P5 asymmetrical; both legs typically with 3-segmented rami; exopod 2-segmented due to fusion of 2nd and 3rd segments fused on left side in Epacteriscus. Endopods similar to those of female with armature 0-1; 0-1; 2,2,2; slightly transformed in some genera. Exopods usually highly transformed; most complex structures usually present on left exopod; modified with a slender spiniform distal segment, long and curved on right side in Erebonectes and Enanttiosis. |
Issued from : G.A. Boxshall & S.H. Halsey in An Introduction to Copepod Diversity. The Ray Society, 2004, No 166, Part. I. [p.113, Fig.21]. Epacteriscidae. A, Erebonectes nesioticus habitus male; B, A1; C, A2; D, Epacteriscus rapax habitus female; E, P5. [Fosshagen & Iliffe, 1985: A; Huys & Boxshall, 1991: B-C, E; Fosshagen, 1973: D] |
Issued from : J.M. Bradford-Grieve in NIWA Biodiv. Memoir 111, 1999 [p.26]. Armature formula of the swimming legs P1 to P5. | | | | (1) Azygonectes Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2004 | |
| Ref.: | Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2004 (p.119); 2007 (p.80: emendation, 91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis) | Rem.: | Total: 2 spp. Bradford-Grieve & al. (2014, p.530) considèrent ce genre , après analyse phylogénétique, comme de placement incertain dans cette famille. | | | (2) Balinella Fosshagen, Boxshall & Iliffe, 2001 | |
| Ref.: | Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.292, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 529: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11) | Rem.: | Total: 1 sp. | | | (3) Bofuriella Fosshagen, Boxshall & Iliffe, 2001 | |
| Ref.: | Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.286, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.85: emendation, p.92) | Rem.: | 3 spp.: | | | (4) Bomburiella Fosshagen, Boxshall & Iliffe, 2001 | |
| Ref.: | Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.282, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.92); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis) | Rem.: | Total: 1 sp. | | | (5) Bunderia Jaume & Humphreys, 2001 | |
| Ref.: | Jaume & Humphreys (p.158, 168); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.92); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis) | Rem.: | Toyal: 1 sp. : | | | (6) Caiconectes Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 | |
| Ref.: | Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.74, 91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 530, Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11). | Rem.: | Total: 1 sp. Bradford-Grieve & al. (2014, p.530) considèrent ce genre , après analyse phylogénétique, comme de place incertaine dans cette famille. | | | (7) Cryptonectes Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2004 | |
| Ref.: | Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2004 (p.122); 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis) | Rem.: | Total: 1 sp.: | | | (8) Edaxiella Fosshagen, Boxshall & Iliffe, 2001 | |
| Ref.: | Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.247, 316); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.92); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis) | Rem.: | Total: 1 sp.: | | | (9) Enantiosis Barr,1984; emend. Fosshagen, Boxshall & Iliffe, 2001 | |
| Ref.: | Barr, 1984 (p.161); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 1985 (p.346); Huys & Boxshall, 1991 (p.62, 63); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Mauchline, 1998 (p.70: F; p.73: M; comme Enantiosus); Bradford-Grieve, 1999 b (p.26, Def.); Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.258, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.92); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis) | Rem.: | Total: 7 spp.: | Remarques sur les dimensions et le sex-ratio: | | The mean female size is 1.328 mm (n = 11, SD = 0.115), and the mean male size is 1.235 mm (n = 13, SD = 0.085). The size ratio male: female is 0.923. | | | (10) Enantronia Fosshagen, Boxshall & Iliffe, 2001 | |
| Ref.: | Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.251, 316); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.993); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis) | Rem.: | Total: 1 sp.: | Issued from : F. Vives & A.A. Shmeleva in Fauna Iberica, 26, 2007. [p. 994, Fig. 573, A-D]. Enantronia canariensis Female. A, habitus (dorsal view); B, urosome (lateral view); C, Mxp; D, P1. | | | | (11) Enantronoides Fosshagen, Boxshall & Iliffe, 2001 | |
| Ref.: | Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.255, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis) | Rem.: | Total: 1 sp.: | | | (12) Epacteriscus Fosshagen,1973; emend. Fosshagen, Boxshall & Iliffe, 2001 | |
| Ref.: | Fosshagen, 1973 (p.146); Huys & Boxshall, 1991 (p.53); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Mauchline, 1998 (p.68); Bradford-Grieve, 1999 b (p.26, Déf.); Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.276, 316, Rem.); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis) | Rem.: | type: Epacteriscus rapax. Total: 3 spp. | Issued from : G.A. Boxshall & S.H. Halsey in The Ray Society, 2004. [p.113, Fig. 21, D, E]. Epacteriscus rapax Female. D, habitus (lateral view); E, P5. | | | | (13) Erebonectes Fosshagen,1985; emend. Fosshagen, Boxshall & Iliffe, 2001 | |
| Ref.: | Fosshagen & Iliffe, 1985 (p.346); Huys & Boxshall, 1991(p.50, 51); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Mauchline, 1998 (p.67); Bradford-Grieve, 1999 b (p.26, Déf.); Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.291, 316, Rem.); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis) | Rem.: | Total: 1 sp.: | Issued from : G. A. Boxshall & S.H. Halsey in The Ray Society, 2004. [p.179, Fig. 21, A-C]. Erebonectes nesioticus Male. A, habitus (dorsal view); B, A1; C, A2. | | | | (14) Erebonectoides Fosshagen, Boxshall & Iliffe, 2001 | |
| Ref.: | Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.291, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve, 2014 (p.507, 530, fig.9, 10, 11) | Rem.: | 1 sp. Bradford-Grieve & al. (2014, p.530) considèrent ce genre, après analyse phylogénétique, comme de place incertaine dans cette famille. | | | (15) Gloinella Fosshagen, 2001 | |
| Ref.: | Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.301, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.92); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis) | Rem.: | Total: 1 sp.: | | | (16) Iboyella Boxshall & Jaume, 2003 | |
| Ref.: | Boxshall & Jaume, 2003 (p.86); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2007 (p.92); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis) | Rem.: | Total: 1 sp. | | | (17) Miheptneria Andronov, 2007 | |
| Ref.: | Andronov, 2007 (p.672); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis) | Rem.: | Type: Miheptneria abyssalis. Total: 1sp. | | | (18) Minnonectes Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2004 | |
| Ref.: | Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2004 (p.128: male diagnosis); 2007 (p.88: female diagnosis, p.92); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 529: Rem., Table 1, Fig. 9, 10, 11) | Rem.: | Total: 1 sp.: | | | (19) Oinella Fosshagen, Boxshall & Iliffe, 2001 | |
| Ref.: | Fosshagen & al., 2001 (p.297, 316); Bradford-Grieve, 2004 (p.287); Fosshagen & Iliffe, 2004 (p.132); 2007 (p.91); Bradford-Grieve & al., 2014 (p.507, 522: Rem., Table 1, fig. 9, 10, 11, cladistic analysis) | Rem.: | Total: 1 sp.: | | | | | | |
|
Toute utilisation de ce site pour une publication sera mentionnée avec la référence suivante : Razouls C., Desreumaux N., Kouwenberg J. et de Bovée F., 2005-2024. - Biodiversité des Copépodes planctoniques marins (morphologie, répartition géographique et données biologiques). Sorbonne Université, CNRS. Disponible sur http://copepodes.obs-banyuls.fr [Accédé le 21 novembre 2024] © copyright 2005-2024 Sorbonne Université, CNRS
|
|
|
|