|
|
 |
|
Calanoida ( Ordre ) |
|
|
|
Arietelloidea ( Superfamille ) |
|
|
| |
| | | |
| Augaptilidae Sars, 1905 ( Arietelloidea ) | | Ref.: | Sars, 1905 c (p.4); Gurney, 1931 a (p.84); Sewell, 1932 (p.312, Rev.); Rose, 1933 a (p.209); Brodsky, 1950 (1967) (p.82, 359); Matthews, 1972 (p.4); Björnberg, 1972 (p.49, N); Andronov, 1974 a (p.1005); Bowman & Abele, 1982 (p.9); Björnberg & al., 1981 (p.650); Razouls, 1982 (p.478); Brodsky & al., 1983 (p.141, 145); Zheng Zhong & al., 1984 (1989) (p.248, spp. Key); Mauchline, 1988 (p.705: cuticular pores); Huys & Boxshall, 1991 (p.460); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Madhupratap & al., 1996 (p.863, Table 5: %/copepods); Chihara & Murano, 1997 (p.727); Bradford-Grieve & al., 1999 (p.882, 901, 903, 937, Genera Key); Bradford-Grieve,1999 b (p.39, Def., Rem.); Matsuura & Nishida, 2000 (p.339, Rem.: button setae on Mx2 and Mxp); Ohtsuka & Huys, 2001 (p.461); Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 (p.13, 14; 49; 66: Def.; p.68: Genera Key); Mulyadi, 2004 (p.184); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.168, Genera Key); Blanco-Bercial & al., 2011 (p.103, Table 1, Fig.2, 3, 4, molecular biology, phylogeny); Laakmann & al., 2019 (p.330, fig. 2, 3, phylogenetic relationships); Hirai & al., 2020 (p.1, Fig.4: metabarcoding, Fig.8: OTUs distribution patterns)
Bradford-Grieve J.M., (2002 onwards). Key to calanoid copepod families. Version 1 : 2 oct 2002. http://www.crustacea.net/crustace/calanoida/index.htm  | | Rem.: | Cette famille a été revue par Brodsky (1950) qui ajoute le genre nouveau Neoaugaptilus. Matthews (1972) reprend l'historique de cette famille et y inclut le genre Disco de Grice et Hulsemann (1965) qui constituera ultérieurement le type d'une nouvelle famille (Discoidae).
A la suite de Sewell (1932, 1947) et de Vervoort (1965), Matthews reconsidère le problème des groupements possibles et souhaitables au sein du genre Euaugaptilus par une méthode d'analyse numérique. Les coefficients de similarité obtenus à partir de 35 caractères et leur classement par une analyse en coordonnées principales permettent à l'auteur de définir deux groupes d'espèces: 'E. affinis' et 'E. squamatus', et de préciser les affinités spécifiques qui peuvent conduire à une mise en synonymie comme pour E. marginatus et E. longiantennalis. De même il est suggéré que le genre Neoaugaptilus ne devrait pas être maintenu. Tanaka et Omori (1974) ont utilisé la même procédure pour les espèces recueillies dans les eaux japonaises en considérant 21 caractères.
10 ou 11 G.: Alrhabdus (?), Augaptilina, Augaptilus, Centraugaptilus, Euaugaptilus, Frankferrarius, Haloptilus, Heteroptilus, Pontoptilus, Pseudaugaptilus, Pseudhaloptilus. Neoaugaptilus est synonyme de Euaugaptilus (in Matthews,1972, p.63) et Disco constitue le type de la famille des Discoidae (in Gordeeva,1975, p.189).
Bradford-Grieve & al., 1999 (p.942) et Bradford-Grieve,1999 b (p.42) considèrent le genre Pseudhaloptilus comme synonyme de Pachyptilus.
Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 (p.68) s'appuyant sur un travail de Soh (1998, non publié) considèrent que Pachyptilus est synonyme junior de Pseudhaloptilus. Ils incorporent le genre Alrhabdus (Heterorhabdidae) comme incertae sedis parmi les Augaptilidae jusqu'à la connaissance du mâle.
After Madhupratap & al. (1996), la famille des Augaptilidae représente de 0,1 à 0,4 % des copepodes selon la saison dans la couche de mélange des eaux océaniques de la région ouest de l'Inde (Mer Arabe) en usant un filet type Multiple Plankton Closing Net à 200 µm de vide de maille (mesh aperture). |  Issued from : G.A. Boxshall & S.H. Halsey in An Introduction to Copepod Diversity. The Ray Society, 2004, No 166, Part. I. [p.66]. Armature formula of swimming legs P1 to P5. * Inner seta on basis of P1 present in Alrhabdus, typically absent. Outer basal seta sometimes present on P3, as in Alrhabdus. Npta: Female P5 of similar construction to legs P1 to P4, with 3-segmented rami; endopod 2-segmented in Pontoptilus, 1-segmented in Heteroptilus and Pseudhaloptilus; setation of legs P1 to P5 often reduced. Exopodal setation of female P5 of Alrhabdus : 1-0; I-1; II,I,4. - Male P5 primitively symmetrical and biramous with 2 or 3-segmented rami, but retaining few setation elements, usually outer and terminal spines on exopod, and distal elzments on endopod. - Eggs release into water. |
 Issued from : G.A. Boxshall & S.H. Halsey in An Introduction to Copepod Diversity. The Ray Society, 2004, No 166, Part. I. [p.67, Fig.6]. Augaptilidae. A, Pseudhaloptilus lobatus (as Pachyptilus lobatus) habitus female; B, Euaugaptilus oblongus hanitus female; C, male P5; D, Euaugaptilus bullifer female rostrum; E, Haloptilus validus female A2; F, female Mx1; G, Haloptilus tenuis female P1; H, Augaptilus glacialis tip of male A1. [Sars, 1924]. |
 Issued from : G.A. Boxshall & S.H. Halsey in An Introduction to Copepod Diversity. The Ray Society, 2004, No 166, Part. I. [p.69, Fig.7]. Augaptilidae. A, Centraugaptilus cucullatus female Mx1; B, Augaptilus megalurus female Md; C, Augaotilus sp. female A2; D, Pseudhaloptilus pacificus female left Md; E, Augaptilus sp. female Mx1; F, Haloptilus fons female Mx2. [Soh, 1998]. |
Issued from : G.A. Boxshall & S.H. Halsey in An Introduction to Copepod Diversity. The Ray Society, 2004, No 166, Part. I. [p.69, Fig.7]. Augaptilidae. A, Centraugaptilus cucullatus female Mx1; B, Augaptilus megalurus female Md; C, Augaotilus sp. female A2; D, Pseudhaloptilus pacificus female left Md; E, Augaptilus sp. female Mx1; F, Haloptilus fons female Mx2. [Soh, 1998]. |
 Issued from : J.M. Bradford-Grieve in NIWA Biodiversity Memoir, 111, 1999 [p.41]. Spine and seta formula of swimming legs P1 to P5. Female and male similar except P5. - P5 female: natatory, symmetrical, similar to other swimming legs but smaller than P2-P4; inner edge seta on exopod segment 2 often spine-like and articulated with its segment. - P5 male: with 3-segmented endopod and exopod on both left and right, slightly asymmetrical; right exopod segment 2 with inner expansion of variable shape but usually in the form of a thick spine. | | | | | (0) Alrhabdus Grice, 1973 (? Augaptilidae ) | |
| | Ref.: | Grice, 1973 (p.943, 946); Razouls, 1982 (p.476); 1993 (p.307); Mauchline, 1998 (p.70); Bradford-Grieve, 1999 b (p.71, Def.); Park, 2000 (p.1, 8, 141); Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 (p.68, Rem.); Renz & Markhaseva, 2015 (p.96, Table 4, fig.3, sex ratio, biogeography) | | Rem.: | Grice (1973, p.946) placed the genus among the Heterorhabdidae, until a male is found. Boxshall & Halsey (2004, p.68) placed the genus in Augaptilidae, as incertae sedis.
1 sp.: | | | | (1) Augaptilina Sars, 1920 | |
| | Ref.: | Sars, 1920 c (p.17); 1925 (p.308); Rose, 1933 a (p.234); Tanaka, 1964 b (p.84); Matthews, 1972 (p.4); Razouls, 1982 (p.516); Mauchline, 1988 (p.704); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Mauchline, 1998 (p.66); Bradford-Grieve,1999 b (p.42, Def.); Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 (p.70); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.169) | | Rem.: | Type: Augaptillina scopifera. 1sp.
Sars (1925, p.308) souligne le caractère tout à fait remarquable des soies des Mx2 et Mxp qui caractérisent ce genre au sein de la famille. | | Remarques sur les dimensions et le sex-ratio: | | Body length from 1 female: 4.30 mm. | | | | (2) Augaptilus Giesbrecht, 1889 | |
| | Syn.: | Hemicalanus (part.) Claus, 1863 (p.176); Sars, 1900 (p.94) | | Ref.: | Giesbrecht, 1892 (part., p.65, 400); Giesbrecht & Schmeil, 1898 (p.120, clé spp.); Sars, 1900 (p.87); Esterly, 1905 (p.187); van Breemen, 1908 a (p.131, spp. Key); Farran, 1908 b (p.71); A. Scott, 1909 (p.135); Wolfenden, 1911 (p.332); Sars, 1920 c (p.12, Rem.); 1925 (p.254); Farran, 1926 (p.288); Sewell, 1932 (p.313, 325); Wilson, 1932 a (p.135); Rose, 1933 a (p.215, clé spp.); Brodsky, 1950 (1967) (p.366, spp. Key); Tanaka, 1964 b (p.74); Matthews, 1972 (p.3, 4, 45, tab.5); Razouls, 1982 (p.485); Mauchline, 1988 (p.702); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Chihara & Murano, 1997 (p.727); Mauchline, 1998 (p.71: F; p.74: M); Bradford-Grieve & al., 1999 (p.939: spp. Key); Bradford-Grieve,1999 b (p.42, Def.); Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 (p.70); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.169, spp. key) | | Rem.: | type : Augaptilus longicaudatus (Claus,1863). Total: 7 spp. (dont 1 douteuse): | | Remarques sur les dimensions et le sex-ratio: | | Le rapport des longueurs male/female établis pour les trois espèces qui présentent les deux sexes est en moyenne de 0, 962 (valeurs extrêmes: 0,869 et 1,122) | | | Remarque : Les espèces suivantes ont été à l'origine incluses dans le genre Augaptilus :
A. angustus Sars,1905 ( Cf. Euaugaptilus angustus ); A. antarcticus Wolfenden, 1911 (Cf. Euaugaptilus laticeps ); A. brevicaudatus Sars,1905 (Cf. Euaugaptilus squamatus ); A. bullifer Giesbrecht,1889 (Cf. Euaugaptilus bullifer ); A. californicus Esterly,1913 (Cf. Euaugaptilus squamatus ); A. clavatus Sars,1907 (Cf. Euaugaptilus clavatus ); A. cucullatus Sars,1905 (Cf. Centraugaptilus cucullatus ); A. depressus Esterly,1913 (Cf. Euaugaptilus filigerus ); A. elongatus Sars,1905 (Cf. Euaugaptilus elongatus ); A. facilis Farran,1908 (Cf. Euaugaptilus facilis ); Augaptilus fungiferus Steuer,1904 (F) [Ref.: Steuer,1904 (p.597,Descr.F); Wolfenden,1911 (p.336,figs.F); Matthews,1972 (p.35, Rem .)](Cf. Euaugaptilus magnus ); A. gibbus Wolfenden, 1904 (Cf. Euaugaptilus gibbus (Wolfenden, 1904); Augaptilus gibbus Sars,1905 [Ref.: Sars,1905 c (p.16,Rem.F);1907 a (p.3); Matthews,1972 (p.31)](Cf. Euaugaptilus gibbus (Wolfenden,1904)); A. gracilis Sars,1905 ( Cf. Euaugaptilus gracilis ); A. hecticus Giesbrecht,1889 (Cf. Euaugaptilus hecticus ); A. horridus Farran,1908 (F) (Cf. Centraugaptilus horridus ); A. laticeps Sars,1905 (Cf. Euaugaptilus laticeps ); A. latifrons Sars, 1907 (Cf. Euaugaptilus latifrons ); A. longicirrhus Sars,1905 (Cf. Euaugaptilus longicirrhus ); A. longimanus Sars,1905 (Cf. Euaugaptilus longimanus ); A. lucidus Esterly, 1911 (Cf. Centraugaptilus lucidus ); A. macrodus Esterly, 1911(Cf. Centraugaptilus rattrayi ); A. magnus Wolfenden,1904 (Cf. Euaugaptilus magnus ); A. mixtus Sars,1907 (Cf. Euaugaptilus mixtus ); A. nodifrons Sars,1905 (Cf. Euaugaptilus nodifrons ); A. oblongus Sars,1905 (Cf. Euaugaptilus oblongus ); A. palumbii Giesbrecht,1889 (Cf. Euaugaptilus palumboi ); A. placitus A. Scott,1909 (Cf. Euaugaptilus laticeps ); A. pyramidalis Esterly,1911 (Cf. Centraugaptilus horridus ); A. rattrayi T. Scott,1894 (Cf. Centraugaptilus rattrayi ); A. romanus Esterly, 1913 (Cf. Euaugaptilus filigerus ); A. rostratus Esterly,1906 (Cf. Euaugaptilus oblongus ); A. similis Farran,1908 (Cf. Euaugaptilus similis ); A. simplex Wolfenden,1911 (Cf. Euaugaptilus nodifrons ); Augaptilus simplex Esterly,1913 (Cf. Euaugaptilus nodifrons ); A. squamatus Giesbrecht,1889 (Cf. Euaugaptilus squamatus ); A. subfiligerus Wolfenden,1911 (Cf. Euaugaptilus oblongus ); A. tenuicaudis Sars,1905 (Cf. Euaugaptilus tenuicaudis ); A. tenuispinus Sars,1920 (Cf. Euaugaptilus tenuispinus ); A. truncatus Sars,1905 (Cf. Euaugaptilus truncatus ); A. validus A. Scott,1909 (Cf. Euaugaptilus validus ); A. zetesios Wolfenden,1902 (Cf. Augaptilus glacialis ) | | | | (3) Centraugaptilus Sars, 1920 | |
| | Ref.: | Sars, 1920 c (p.17);1925 (p.304); Sewell, 1932 (313, 326); Rose, 1933 a (p.232); Brodsky, 1950 (1967) (p.386, clé spp.); Tanaka, 1964 b (p.80, 81); Matthews, 1972 (p.4, 56); Razouls, 1982 (p.514); Gardner & Szabo, 1982 (p.383); Mauchline, 1988 (p.704); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Chihara & Murano, 1997 (p.727); Mauchline, 1998 (p.71: F; p.74: M); Bradford-Grieve & al., 1999 (p.938, 939: clé spp.); Bradford-Grieve,1999 b (p.42, Def.); Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 (p.70); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.178, spp. key) | | Rem.: | type: Centraugaptilus rattrayi (T. Scott, 1894). Total: 6 spp. | | Remarques sur les dimensions et le sex-ratio: | | Les écarts de taille pour la plupart des espèces de ce genre apparaissent importantes, apparemment essentiellement chez les femelles. |  Issued from : J.M. Bradford-Grieve in NIWA Biodiversity Memoir 111, 1999. [p.46, Fig.19]. Centraugaptilus horridus. Female (from Sars, 1924): A, habitus (lateral view); B, P5. Male (from Bradford-Grieve, 1999 b): C, habitus (lateral view); D, Mandibular blade; E, Mx1; F, P1; G, P5. | | | | | (4) Euaugaptilus Sars, 1920 | |
| | Syn.: | Neogaptilus Brodsky, 1950 (1967) (p.360, 385); Tanaka, 1964 b (p.74); Matthews, 1972 (p.4, 63, Rem.); Razouls, 1982 (p.514); 1993 (p.306) | | Ref.: | Sars, 1920 c (p.13); 1925 (p.260, Rem.); Farran, 1926 (p.288); Sewell, 1932 (p.313, 316, Rem.); 1947 (p.196, 198, 206, 222, 231, Rev.); Rose, 1933 a (p.220, spp. Key); Brodsky, 1950 (1967) (p.373, spp. Key); Tanaka, 1964 b (p.45); Vervoort, 1965 (p.133, Rem.); Owre & Foyo, 1967 (p.83, spp. Key); Matthews, 1972 (p.3,4, Rev., tab.5); Tanaka Omori, 1974 (p.193, Rev., spp. Key); Roe, 1975 (p.346); Razouls, 1982 (p.495); Boxshall, 1986 (p.158); Mauchline, 1988 (p.702); Huys & Boxshall, 1991 (p.56, 316, 318); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Park, 1993 (p.2, Rem., spp. Key); Chihara & Murano, 1997 (p.727); Mauchline, 1998 (p.71, 76: F; p.73, 74, 76: M); Bradford-Grieve & al., 1999 (p.938, 939: spp. Key); Bradford-Grieve,1999 b (p.46, Def.); Matsuura & Nishida, 2000 (p.339, Rem.: button setae on Mx2 and Mxp); Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 (p.70); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.182, spp. Key); Ohtsuka & Boxshall, 2004 (p.54: Rem.) | | Rem.: | Bradford-Grieve (1999 b) suit la position de Matthews (1972, p.63) concernant la synonymie de Neogaptilus. Ce genre est essentiellement bathypélagique. 72 spp. + 1 indet.: | | Remarques sur les dimensions et le sex-ratio: | | Le rapport des longueurs male/femelle en ne considérant que le cas des espèces présentant ensemble males et femelles est de 0, 935 (n = 26; SD = 0,0835) avec des valeurs extrêmes de 1, 112 et 0,776. |  issued from : H. Matsuura, S. Nishida & J. Nishikawa in Deep-Sea Res. II, 2010, 57. [p.2105, Fig.8]. Vertical distribution of all Euaugaptilus species in the Celebes Sea. Species in bold letters indicate species that also occured in MOCNESS samples (0-1000 m) from the Sulu Sea. Species in brackets indicate species that were absent from MOCNESS samples but occurred in ORI net/IKMT samples that reached below 1000 m in the Sulu Sea. The water column integrated abundances and the depth ranges representing 50% and 80% of the population are shown for species with abundances of 0.5 inds per m2 or more, but only the layers of occurrence are indicated for species of lesser abundance. |
 issued from : H. Matsuura, S. Nishida & J. Nishikawa in Deep-Sea Res. II, 2010, 57. [p.2101, Fig.2]. Vertical profiles of water temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen at stations in the Celebes (A) and Sulu Seas (B) | | | | | (5) Frankferrarius Markhaseva, 2013 | |
| | Ref.: | Markhaseva, 2013 (p.1251, Def., Rem.); Renz & Markhaseva, 2015 (p.96, Table 4, fig.3, sex ratio, biogeography) | | Rem.: | Type: Frankferrarius admirabilis Markhaseva, 2013. 1 sp. | | Remarques sur les dimensions et le sex-ratio: | | The body size for only 1 female is 7.0 mm, and for 1 male 11.2 mm. The male size is greater than the female that is not usual. | | | | (6) Haloptilus Giesbrecht, 1898 | |
| | Syn.: | Hemicalanus (part.) Claus, 1863 (p.176); Brady, 1883 (p.43); Giesbrecht, 1889, 1892 (p.65, 384); Sars, 1900 (p.94) | | Ref.: | Giesbrecht & Schmeil, 1898 (p.117, clé spp.); Sars, 1902 (1903) (p.120); van Breemen, 1908 a (p.127); A. Scott, 1909 (p.140); Sewell, 1932 (p.328); Rose, 1933 a (p.209, clé spp.); Mori, 1937 (1964) (p.74, clé spp.); Sewell, 1947 (p.189); Brodsky, 1950 (1967) (p.361, key spp.); Tanaka, 1964 b (p.39); Björnberg, 1972 (p.51, N); Matthews, 1972 (p.4, 47, tab.5); Björnberg & al., 1981 (p.653); Razouls, 1982 (p.478); Gardner & Szabo, 1982 (p.387); Mauchline, 1988 (p.702); Park, 1988 (p.2, Redef., key of Antactic spp. F, 3 groups); Zheng Zhong & al., 1984 (1989) (p.249, Rem.); Huys & Boxshall, 1991 (p.53); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Chihara & Murano, 1997 (p.728); Mauchline, 1998 (p.71: F; p.74: M); Bradford-Grieve & al., 1999 (p.938, 941: spp. Key); Bradford-Grieve, 1999 b (p.58, Def.); Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 (p.68); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.234, spp. key) | | Rem.: | sp. type: Haloptilus plumosus (Claus, 1863) . 26 spp. (dont 2 douteuses) + 2 indet. | | Remarques sur les dimensions et le sex-ratio: | | Le rapport des longueurs (M/F) est de 0,706 (n = 11; SD = 0,1132) si l'on ne prend en considération que les espèces comportant les deux sexes. | | | | (7) Heteroptilus Sars, 1920 | |
| | Syn.: | Pontoptilus (part.) Sars, 1905 c (p.18) | | Ref.: | Sars, 1920 c (p.19);1925 (p.324); Rose, 1933 a (p.327); Brodsky, 1950 (1967) (p.39, 360, Rem.); Tanaka, 1964 b (p.91); Matthews, 1972 (p.4); Razouls, 1982 (p.519); Mauchline, 1988 (p.705); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Mauchline, 1998 (p.71, 76, 76: F; p.74, 76: M); Bradford-Grieve, 1999 b (p.66, Def.); Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 (p.70); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.256, spp. key) | | Rem.: | sp. type: Pontoptilus attenuatus. 2 spp. + 1 indet. : | | Remarques sur les dimensions et le sex-ratio: | | The mean female size is 4.723 mm (n = 3; SD = 0.8925) and for male 4.795 mm (n = 2; SD = 2.1819). The size ratio (Male: Female) is 0.719 from only 1 species. | | | | Neoaugaptilus Brodsky, 1950 | |
| | Ref.: | Brodsky, 1950 (1967) (p.360, 385); Tanaka, 1964 b (p.74); Matthews, 1972 (p.4, 63, Rem.); Razouls, 1982 (p.514); 1993 (p.306); Bradford-Grieve,1999 b (p.46, Rem.: 47) | | Rem.: | type: Neoaugaptilus distinctus. Cf. Euaugaptilus | | | | | Ref.: | Pachyptilus Sars, 1920 c (p.18); 1925 (p.318); Wilson, 1932 a (p.545); Rose, 1933 a (p.236); Brodsky, 1950 (1967) (p.361, 392); Tanaka, 1964 b (p.86); Bradford, 1972 (p.14); Matthews, 1972 (p.12); Razouls, 1982 (p.518); Gardner & Szabo, 1982 (p.391); Mauchline, 1988 (p.704); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Chihara & Murano, 1997 (p.729); Mauchline, 1998 (p.71, 76: F); Bradford-Grieve & al., 1999 (p.938, 942: clé spp.); Bradford-Grieve,1999 b (p.67, déf.) | | Rem.: | Cf. Pseudhaloptilus (ce genre est considéré come discutable par Bradford-Grieve & al.,1999, p.942, mais admis par Boxshall & Halsey, 2004, p.68 qui considèrent Pachyptilus comme un synonyme junior). | | Remarques sur les dimensions et le sex-ratio: | | La moyenne des longueurs des femelles est de 5,395 mm (n= 4; S= 0,308; Cv= 0,057). Le seul mâle connu a une longueur de 4,600 mm. Le rapport des longueurs (M/F) établi pour une seule espèce est de 0,817 ou 81,7 %. | | | | (8) Pontoptilus Sars, 1905 | |
| | Ref.: | (part.) Sars, 1905 c (p.18); 1925 (p.312, Rev.); Sewell, 1932 (p.329); Rose, 1933 a (p.235); Tanaka, 1964 b (p.86); Matthews, 1972 (p.4); Razouls, 1982 (p.516); Mauchline, 1988 (p.704); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Mauchline, 1998 (p.70: F; p.74: M); Bradford-Grieve,1999 b (p.668, Déf.); Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 (p.70); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.265, spp. key) | | Rem.: | Type: Pontoptilus muticus Sars, 1905. Total: 6 spp.
Corps assez massif. Partie postérieure du dernier segment thoracique arrondi ou en pointe. | | Remarques sur les dimensions et le sex-ratio: | | The mean female size is 5.870 mm (n = 8; SD = 1.4782). The only known male is 6.8 mm long. The size ratio (Male: Female) for a single species is 0.799. | | | | (9) Pseudaugaptilus Sars, 1907 | |
| | Ref.: | Sars, 1907 a (p.24); 1925 (p.310); Rose, 1933 a (p.235); Brodsky, 1950 (1967) (p.361, 390); Tanaka, 1964 b (p.84); Matthews, 1972 (p.3, 4, 55, tab.5); Razouls, 1982 (p.520); 1993 (p.306); Chihara & Murano, 1997 (p.729); Mauchline, 1998 (p.71: F; p.74: M); Bradford-Grieve,1999 b (p.68, Def.); Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 (p.70); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.264) | | Rem.: | Type: Isochaeta longisetosus. Total: 3 spp. (dont 1 douteuse): | | Remarques sur les dimensions et le sex-ratio: | | The mean female size is 4.856 mm (n = 5; SD = 1.053), and for the male of one species 4.320 mm. The size ratio (Male: female) is 1.026 from only 1 species. | | | | (10) Pseudhaloptilus Wolfenden, 1911 | |
| | Syn.: | Pachyptilus Sars, 1920 c (p.18); 1925 (p.318); Wilson, 1932 a (p.545); Rose, 1933 a (p.236); Brodsky, 1950 (1967) (p.361, 392); Tanaka, 1964 b (p.86); Bradford, 1972 (p.14); Matthews, 1972 (p.12); Razouls, 1982 (p.518); Gardner & Szabo, 1982 (p.391); Mauchline, 1988 (p.704); Razouls, 1993 (p.306); Chihara & Murano, 1997 (p.729); Mauchline, 1998 (p.73, 76: F); Bradford-Grieve & al., 1999 (p.938, 942: spp. Key, Rem.: genus questionable); Bradford-Grieve,1999 b (p.67, Def.); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.259, spp. key) | | Ref.: | Wolfenden, 1911 (p.325); Wilson, 1932 a (p.545); Matthews, 1972 (p.4); Razouls, 1982 (p.485); 1993 (p.306); Boxshall & Halsey (2004, p.68: Rem; p.70) | | Rem.: | Total: 5 spp. | | Remarques sur les dimensions et le sex-ratio: | | The mean female size is 5.542 mm (n = 9; SD =0.9374). The size ratio (Male: Female) is 0.817 from only 1 species. The sex ratio (F: M) is 5. |  Issued from : J.M. Bradford-Grieve in NIWA Biodiversity Memoir 111, 1999. [p.67, Fig.38]. Pachyptilus eurygnathus (= Pseudhaloptilus eurygnathus). Female (from Bradford-Grieve, 1999 b): A, habitus (lateral view); B, left Md; C, Mx1; D, P1; E, P5. |
 Issued from : G.A. Boxshall & S.H. Halsey inThe Ray Society, No 166, 2004. [p.69, Fig.7]. Pseudhaloptilus pacificusFemale: D, left Mandible. | | | | | | | |
|
|
 Toute utilisation de ce site pour une publication sera mentionnée avec la référence suivante :
Razouls C., Desreumaux N., Kouwenberg J. et de Bovée F., 2005-2024. - Biodiversité des Copépodes planctoniques marins (morphologie, répartition géographique et données biologiques). Sorbonne Université, CNRS. Disponible sur http://copepodes.obs-banyuls.fr [Accédé le 23 avril 2024] © copyright 2005-2024 Sorbonne Université, CNRS
|
|
|
|
;){kind=small}
;)
;)
;)
;){kind=small}
;)
;){kind=small}
;)
;)
;)
