Planche 1 Issued from : F. Vives & A.A. Shmeleva in Fauna Iberica, 2010, 33. [p.174, Fig.73]. As Monstrilla angustipes. After Isaac, 1974. Female: A-B, habitus (dorsal and lateral, respectively); C, 5th thoracic segment and abdomen (dorsal); D, right A1; E, P5.
Planche 2 Issued from : E. Suarez-Morales, A. Bello-Smith & S. Palma in Zool. Anz., 2006, 245. [p.103, Table 1]. Structural characteristics. Morphological characters for comparative morphology of the species assigned to the genus Monstrillopsis by different authorities. See : M. chilensis, M. dubioides, M. fosshageni, reticulata, sarsi, Cymbasoma gracilis, M. ferrari, M. zernovi, M. dubia, Monstrillopsis sp.
Distribution
NZ: 1
Carte de distribution de Monstrillopsis angustipes par zones géographiques
According to Suarez-Morales & al. (2006, p.104) suggest that the species should be transferred to Monstrilla because the presence of 5 caudal setae, the lack of an inner lobe on P5 and the location of the oral papilla (more than 0.25 of the way back along the ventral cephalothorax). Proposition adopted by Vives & Shmeleva (2010, p.172). After Grygier & Suarez-Morales (2018, p.502), reexamination and redescription of this form are necessary.
;)
;)
