|
|
Fiche d'espèce de Copépode |
|
Cyclopoida ( Ordre ) |
|
|
Corycaeidae ( Famille ) |
|
|
Corycaeus ( Genre ) |
|
|
Onychocorycaeus ( Sous-Genre ) |
|
|
| |
Corycaeus (Onychocorycaeus) latus Dana, 1849 (F,M) | |
| | | | | | Syn.: | Corycaeus laticeps Dana,1849; 1852; Corycaüs ovalis : Giesbrecht, 1892 (Pl.49, fig.20, Pl.51, ? figs.1,3 : F; fig.2: M); no C. latus : Mori, 1937 (1964) (p.136) ; Onychocorycaeus latus : Dessier, 1983 (p.89, Tableau 1, Rem., %); Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 (p.494); Valdés & al., 2007 (p.104: tab.1); McKinnon & al., 2008 (p.844: Tab.1); Vives & Shmeleva, 2010 (p.237, figs.F,M, Rem.); Belmonte & al., 2013 (p.222, Table 2, abundance vs stations); Marques-Rojas & Zoppi de Roa, 2017 (p.495, Table 1); El Arraj & al., 2017 (p.272, table 2 (as Onchocorycaeus), spatial distribution); | | | Ref.: | | | F. Dahl, 1894 (p.72); M. Dahl, 1912 (p.93, figs.F,M); Farran, 1929 (p.211, 296); Rose, 1929 (p.70); 1933 a (p.331, figs.F,M); Klevenhusen, 1933 a (p.88, chart 40); Dakin & Colefax, 1940 (p.113, figs.M); Tanaka, 1957 (p.95, Rem.); Motoda, 1963 (p.240, figs.M); Owre & Foyo, 1967 (p.123, figs.F,M); Vilela, 1968 (p.39, figs.F,M); Marques, 1968 a (p.397); 1973 (p.250, fig.M); Razouls, 1972 (p.96, Annexe: p.133, figs.M); 1974 c (1975) (p.90, figs.M); Björnberg & al., 1981 (p.676, fig.M); M. Lefèvre, 1986 (p.33); Lakkis & Zeidane, 1987 (p.20, figs.M, Rem.); Boxshall, 1998 (p.224); Bradford-Grieve & al., 1999 (p.888, 975, figs.F,M); | issued from : C. Razouls in Vie Milieu, 1974, 24 (1.A). [p.107, Fig.9]. Male (from W Medit.: Banyuls, France): A, urosome (ventral); B-B', A2.
|
Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. – Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892. Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf.49, Fig.20]. As Corycäus ovalis. Male : 20, A2.
|
Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. – Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892. Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf.51, Fig.2]. As Corycäus ovalis. Male: 2, urosome (ventral).
|
Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. – Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892. Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf.51, Fig.1]. As Corycäus ovalis. Female: 1, habitus (dorsal). Ce = cephalosome; Th = metasomal segment; Ab = urosomal segment.
|
Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. – Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892. Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf.51, Fig.3]. As Corycäus ovalis. Female: 3, urosome (dorsal).
|
issued from : M. Dahl in Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Stiftung. Bd II, G. f1. I. Die Corycaeinen 1912. [Taf.XIII, Figs.1, 2]. Female: 1, habitus (dorsal); 2, idem (lateral left side).
|
issued from : M. Dahl in Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Stiftung. Bd II, G. f1. I. Die Corycaeinen 1912. [Taf.XIII, Fig.5]. Female: 5, A2.
|
issued from : M. Dahl in Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Stiftung. Bd II, G. f1. I. Die Corycaeinen 1912. [Taf.XIII, Figs.7, 8]. Female: 7, endopod of P2; 8, P4.
|
issued from : M. Dahl in Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Stiftung. Bd II, G. f1. I. Die Corycaeinen 1912. [Taf.XIII, Figs.3, 4]. Male: 3, habitus (dorsal); 4, idem (lateral left side).
|
issued from : M. Dahl in Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Stiftung. Bd II, G. f1. I. Die Corycaeinen 1912. [Taf.XIII, Fig.6]. Male: 6, A2.
|
Female: Thoracic segment 3 much wider than the thoracic segment 2. Caudal rami as long as the anal segment. Male: Genital segment approximately as long as the anal segment + caudal rami.
|
Issued from : F. Vives & A.A. Shmeleva in Fauna Iberica, 2010, 33. [p.237, Fig.110]. After Dahl, 1912. Female: A, habitus (dorsal); B, A2; C, P4; D, P2. Male: E, A2; F-G, habitus (dorsal and lateral, respectively)..
| | | | Ref. compl.: | | Sewell, 1948 (p.357, 461); C.B. Wilson, 1950 (p.194, Rem.); Deevey, 1960 (p.5, Table II, annual abundance) ; V.N. Greze, 1963 a (tabl.2); Duran, 1963 (p.26); Björnberg, 1963 (p.85, Rem.); Unterüberbacher, 1964 (p.36); De Decker, 1964 (p.15, 21, 28); De Decker & Mombeck, 1964 (p.12); Pavlova, 1966 (p.45); Neto & Paiva, 1966 (p.33, Table III); Mazza, 1966 (p.74); 1967 (p.377); Ehrhardt, 1967 (p.744, geographic distribution, Rem.); Delalo, 1968 (p.139); Dowidar & El-Maghraby, 1970 (p.268); Deevey, 1971 (p.224); Carli, 1971 (p.372, tab.1); Della Croce & al., 1972 (p.1, Rem.); Bainbridge, 1972 (p.61, Appendix Table I: vertical distribution vs day/night); Apostolopoulou, 1972 (p.329, 389); Binet al., 1972 (p.73); Vives & al., 1975 (tab.II, III); Boxshall, 1977 b (p.555); Deevey & Brooks, 1977 (p.156, tab.2, Station "S"); Dessier, 1979 (p.208); Vaissière & Séguin, 1980 (p.23, tab.1); Vives, 1982 (p.296); Kovalev & Shmeleva, 1982 (p.86); Turner & Dagg, 1983 (p.16, 22); Scotto di Carlo & al., 1984 (p.1044); Regner, 1985 (p.11, Rem.: p.43); Garcia-Rodriguez, 1985 a (p.41, 42); Brinton & al., 1986 (p.228, Table 1); Jimenez-Perez & Lara-Lara, 1988; Lozano Soldevilla & al., 1988 (p.61); Webber & Roff, 1995 (tab.1); Webber & al., 1996 (tab.1); Suarez-Morales & Gasca, 1997 (p.1525); Park & Choi, 1997 (Appendix); Hure & Krsinic, 1998 (p.105); Alvarez-Cadena & al., 1998 (t.2,3,4); Suarez-Morales & Gasca, 1998 a (p.112); Siokou-Frangou, 1999 (p.479); Lavaniegos & Gonzalez-Navarro, 1999 (p.239, Appx.1); Zerouali & Melhaoui, 2002 (p.91, Tableau I); Vukanic, 2003 (p.139, tab.1); Dias & Araujo, 2006 (p.81, Rem., chart); Lopez-Ibarra & Palomares-Garcia, 2006 (p.63, Tabl. 1, seasonal abundance vs El-Niño); Khelifi-Touhami & al., 2007 (p.327, Table 1); Neumann-Leitao & al., 2008 (p.799: Tab.II, fig.6); Magalhaes & al., 2009 (p.187, Table 1, %); Brugnano & al., 2010 (p.312, Table 2, 3); Hernandez-Trujillo & al., 2010 (p.913, Table 2); Dias & al., 2010 (p.230, Table 1); Mazzocchi & Di Capua, 2010 (p.428); Medellin-Mora & Navas S., 2010 (p.265, Tab. 2); Maiphae & Sa-ardrit, 2011 (p.641, Table 2, 3, Rem.); Tutasi & al., 2011 (p.791, Table 2, abundance distribution vs La Niña event); Andersen N.G. & al., 2011 (p.71, Fig.3: abundance); Jean & al., 2012 (p.12, Table 3, protein vs environmental metal stress); Shiganova & al., 2012 (p.61, Table 4); Palomares-Garcia & al., 2013 (p.1009, Table I, abundance vs environmental factors); in CalCOFI regional list (MDO, Nov. 2013; M. Ohman, comm. pers.); Lidvanov & al., 2013 (p.290, Table 2, % composition); Zaafa & al., 2014 (p.67, Table I, occurrence); Bonecker & a., 2014 (p.445, Table II: frequency, horizontal & vertical distributions) ; Marquez-Rojas & al., 2014 (p.8, Rem., %); Rojas-Herrera & al., 2016 (p.40, Table 2: temporal abundance); Benedetti & al., 2016 (p.159, Table I, fig.1, functional characters); Ben Ltaief & al., 2017 (p.1, Table III, Summer relative abundance); Palomares-Garcia & al., 2018 (p.178, Table 1: occurrence) | | | NZ: | 16 | | |
Carte de distribution de Corycaeus (Onychocorycaeus) latus par zones géographiques
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | Loc: | | | South Africa (E), Namibia, Angola, Baia Farta, off Congo, Atlant. (equatorial), off San Tomé et Principe Is., G. of Guinea, Ivorian shelf, Cape Verde Is., off Morocco-Mauritania, off Madeira, Brazil ( off Vitoria-Cabo de Sao Tomé, off Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Curuça estuary), Barbada Is., Caribbean Colombia, Bahia de Mochima (Venezuela), Cariaco Gulf, Yucatan, G. of Mexico, Jamaica, Cuba, Florida, Sargasso Sea, off Bermuda (Station "S"), Delaware Bay (outside), Long Island, off S Nova Scotia, Canary Is., Portugal, NW Spain, Ibero-moroccan Bay, Medit. (M'Diq, Alboran Sea, Gulf of Annaba, laguna Mar Menor, Castellon, Banyuls, Marseille, Toulon Bay, Genova, Tyrrhenian Sea, Taranto, G. of Gabes, Adriatic Sea, Ionian Sea, Aegean Sea, Black Sea, Lebanon Basin, Alexandria), Red Sea, Madagascar (Nosy Bé), Australia (North West Cape, Shark Bay, New South Wales), G. of Thailand, Sulu Sea, Philippines, China Seas, S Japan Sea, off Hawaii, California, W & S Baja California (Bahia Magdalena, La Paz), Gulf of California, Acapulco Bay (rare), W Mexico, Galapagos-Ecuador, Moorea Is. | | | N: | 103 | | | Lg.: | | | (35) F: 1,17-1; (104) M: 0,8; (237) F: 1,12; M: 1,15; (327) F: 1,07-0,92; M: 0,94-0,85; (336) F: 1,09-0,9; M: 1,1-0,8; (432) F: 0,97-0,82; (666) F: 1,18-1,08; M: 1,17-1,15; (667) M: 1; (670) F: 0,99-0,86; M: 0,89-0,85; (786) M: 0,93-0,86; {F: 0,82-1,18; M: 0,80-1,17} | | | Rem.: | épipélagique. C.B. Wilson (1950) signale cette espèce dans le Pacifique; aussi aux îles Tuamotu (Rose, 1953), Moorea, et en Californie (Brinton & al., 1986) Voir aussi les remarques en anglais | | | Dernière mise à jour : 28/10/2022 | |
|
Toute utilisation de ce site pour une publication sera mentionnée avec la référence suivante : Razouls C., Desreumaux N., Kouwenberg J. et de Bovée F., 2005-2024. - Biodiversité des Copépodes planctoniques marins (morphologie, répartition géographique et données biologiques). Sorbonne Université, CNRS. Disponible sur http://copepodes.obs-banyuls.fr [Accédé le 21 novembre 2024] © copyright 2005-2024 Sorbonne Université, CNRS
|
|
|
|