|
|
 |
Fiche d'espèce de Copépode |
|
|
Cyclopoida ( Ordre ) |
|
|
|
Oncaeidae ( Famille ) |
|
|
|
Oncaea ( Genre ) |
|
|
| |
Oncaea ovalis Shmeleva, 1966 (F,M) | |
| | | | | | | Syn.: | ? Oncaea ovalis : Malt & al., 1989 (p.959, figs.M) | | | | Ref.: | | | Shmeleva, 1966 (p.935, Descr.M, figs.M); 1969 ( p.11, figs.M; non F); Boxshall, 1977 a (p.144, Rem); Malt & al., 1989 (p.959, Descr.M, figs.M, Rem.); Böttger-Schnack & al., 1989 (1092, 1093); Böttger-Schnack, 1990 a (p.476, 478, 480, 481); no Heron & Frost, 2000 (p.1052, figs.F,M, tab.2, 3); Böttger-Schnack, 2005 (p.163: Rem., p.179, 183, p.185: Redescr. F,M; figs.F,M, Rem.) ; Vives & Shmeleva, 2010 (p.301, figs.F,M, Rem.); Böttger-Schnack & Machida, 2011 (p.111, Table 1, 2, fig.2, DNA sequences, phylogeny) |  issued from : R. Böttger-Schnack in Cah. Biol. Mar., 2005, 46. [p.187, Fig.11]. Female (from Adriatic Sea): A, habitus (dorsal); B, idem (lateral right side); C, urosome (dorsal); D, idem (lateral left side, caudal setae IV and V omitted); E, A1 (question mark on segment 4 indicating position of aesthetasc in quetion, small pit); F, caudal ramus (dorsale); G, P5 (dorsal). Nota: Proportional lengths (%) of urosomites and caudal rami 7.9:48.0:10.5:8.7:12.7:12.2. Relative lengths (%) of segments of A1 measured along posterior non-setigerous margin 5.5:19.6:48.0:11.4:4.4:11.1. Genital double-somite oval, twice as long as maximum width (measured in dorsal aspect) and 1.5 times longer than postgenital somites combined; Anal somite about as wide as long, slightly longer than caudal rami. Caudal ramus 1.9 times longer than wide.
|
 issued from : R. Böttger-Schnack in Cah. Biol. Mar., 2005, 46. [p.188, Fig.12]. Female: A, A2 (posterior, lateral elements are numbered using Roman numerals, distal elements are identified by capital letters, coxobasal seta omitted) [a, coxobasis and proximal endopod segment, anterior, showing armature and ornamentation details); B, labrum (anterior); C, idem (posterior); D, Md (showing individual elements); E, Mx1; F, Mx2 (seta on outer margin figured separately); G, Mxp (anterior, claw figured separately) [g, elements on palmar margin, posterior view, showing ornamentation details].
|
 issued from : R. Böttger-Schnack in Cah. Biol. Mar., 2005, 46. [p.189, Fig.13]. Female: A, P1 (posterior) [a, intercoxal sclerite, anterior)]; B, P2 (posterior); C, P3 (posterior); D, P4 (anterior).
|
 issued from : R. Böttger-Schnack in Cah. Biol. Mar., 2005, 46. [p.192, Fig.14]. Male (from Eastern mediterranean Sea): A, habitus (dorsal); B, A1 (question mark on segment 4 indicating position of proximalmost aesthetasc, small pit); C, Mxp (posterior) [c1, medial view, distal part of claw omitted; c2, anterior view, syncoxa omitted]; D, urosome (dorsal, spermatophores almost fully developed); E, idem (ventral); F, idem (lateral left side); G, genital lappets (lateral); H, P4 endopod (posterior). Nota: Proportional lengths (%) of urosomites and caudal rami 8.1:51.9:5.1:4.4:4.7:12.9:12.9. Relative lengths (%) of segments of A1 measured along posterior non-setigerous margin 7.8:17:3:48.6:26.3.
|
 issued from : R. Böttger-Schnack in Cah. Biol. Mar., 2005, 46. [p.204, Table 3]. Major morphological characters separating the 2 species groups recognized within the ovalis-complex of Oncaeidae.
|
 issued from : R. Böttger-Schnack in Cah. Biol. Mar., 2005, 46. [p.193, Fig.15]. Male (from Adriatic Sea): A, habitus (dorsal, caudal seta V missing).
|
 issued from : A.A. Shmeleva in Bull. Inst. océanogr. Monaco, 1969, 68, n° 1393. [p.12, Fig.8]. Female (from S Adriatic Sea): a, habitus (dorsal); b, urosome (dorsal); c, A1; d, A2; e, Mxp; f-i, P1 to P4.
|
 issued from : A.A. Shmeleva in Bull. Inst. océanogr. Monaco, 1969, 68, n° 1393. [p.13, Fig.9]. Male: a, habitus (dorsal); b, urosome (dorsal); c, A1; d, A2; e, Mxp; f-i, P1 to P4.
| | | | | Ref. compl.: | | | Kovalev & Shmeleva, 1982 (p.86); Greze & al., 1985 (p.8) ; Böttger-Schnack, 1992 (p.304); 1994 (p.277); 1995 (p.92); 1997 (p.409); Hure & Krsinic, 1998 (p.104); Krsinic, 1998 (p.1051); Böttger-Schnack & al., 2001 (p.1029, tab.1, 2); Krsinic & Grbec, 2002 (p.127, tab.1); Nishibe & Ikeda, 2004 (p.931, Tab. 2, 5); Nishibe & al., 2009 (p.491, Table 1: seasonal abundance); Böttger-Schnack & Schnack, 2009 (p.131, Table 3; 4, Rem.); Uysal & Shmeleva, 2012 (p.909, Table I) | | | | NZ: | 6 + 1 douteuse | | |
|
Carte de distribution de Oncaea ovalis par zones géographiques
|
| | | | | | | | | | Loc: | | | Ibero-moroccan Bay, Medit. (Alboran Sea, S Adriatic Sea, Lebanon Basin), Red Sea, G. of Aden, NE Japan, Tosa Bay, Oyashio region, ? Washington inland (Dabob Bay) | | | | N: | 15 | | | | Lg.: | | | (690) M: 0,31; (696) F: 0,42; M: 0,31; (697) M: 0,37; (848) F: 0,41-0,51; M: 0,41; (933) F: 0,44-0,54; M: 0,44-0,54; {F: 0,41-0,54; M: 0,31-0,54} | | | | Rem.: | mésopélagique.
Malt & al. (1989) estiment que cette espèce n'est pas synonyme de Oncaea curta comme l'exprime Boxshall (1977 a, p.143).
Voir aussi les remarques en anglais | | | Dernière mise à jour : 26/01/2015 | |
|
|
 Toute utilisation de ce site pour une publication sera mentionnée avec la référence suivante :
Razouls C., Desreumaux N., Kouwenberg J. et de Bovée F., 2005-2024. - Biodiversité des Copépodes planctoniques marins (morphologie, répartition géographique et données biologiques). Sorbonne Université, CNRS. Disponible sur http://copepodes.obs-banyuls.fr [Accédé le 21 novembre 2024] © copyright 2005-2024 Sorbonne Université, CNRS
|
|
|
|
;)
;)
;)
;)
;)
;)
;)
;)
