Planche 1 issued from : A.A.A. Mageed in Crustaceana, 2010, 83 (5). [p.516, Fig.2]. Female (from 34°43'N, 29°10'E): habitus (lateral). Nota: Cephalothorax representing 71 % of total body length; cephalothorax without any obvious cuticular surface ornamentation. Oral papilla located at 17 % along ventral surface of cephalothorax from anterior end. Proeminent processes between oral papilla and bases of A1. Eye present, well-developed. Forhead smooth. Urosome 3-segmented (pedigerous somite 5, genital-double-somite and 1 free somite). P5 with inner, finger-like endopodal lobe, parallel to exopodal lobe. Exopodal lobe twice as long as wide, with 3 setae, innermost about half the length of the other two. Genital double-somite slightly shorter than one-third of total length of urosome (32.4 %), ventral portion swollen posteriorly, bearing 2 long ovigerous spines, 1.1 times total body length, fused proximally from base to beyond caudal rami Caudal rami 1.37 times as long as wide, moderately divergent, bearing 3 terminal setae
Planche 2 issued from : A.A.A. Mageed in Crustaceana, 2010, 83 (5). [p.519, Fig.4]. Female: Left A1 (dorsal aspect). Designation of armature elements follows Grygier & Ohtsuka (1995). Nota: A1 4-segmented, about 13.5 % of total body length and 1.9 times as long as cephalothorax. Element 1 is present on the 1st segment; elements 2d1, 2d2, 2v1, 2v2, 2v3 and IId on the 2nd segment; the 3rd segment has elements 3, IIId and IIIv; 4th segment has normally developed elements 4v1, 4d1,2 and 4v2-3, as well as setae IVd, Ivv, Vd and Vm and also element 5. The subterminal elements b1-6 are present. The aesthetasc 4aes is well developed on the ventral surface, and terminal elements 6aes and 6 (2) are present. Element 6 (1) was not observed (may be broken).
Planche 3 issued from : A.A.A. Mageed in Crustaceana, 2010, 83 (5). [p.518, Fig.3]. Female: A-D, P1 to P4 (right legs, posteriorly)
Planche 4 issued from : A.A.A. Mageed in Crustaceana, 2010, 83 (5). [p.517]. Female: Armature of swimming legs P1 to P4 (spines in Roman and setae in Arabic numerals).
Planche 5 issued from : A.A.A. Mageed in Crustaceana, 2010, 83 (5). [p.520, Pl. 2]. Female: A, genital double-somite; B, caudal rami and ovigerous spine base. Nota: Eight shallow, transverse cuticular wrinkles present on lateral margin and dorsal surface of genital double-somite
Planche 6 Issued from : F. Üstün, T. Terbiyik Kurt & E. Suarez-Morales in Crustaceana, 2014, 87 (11-12). [p.1403, Table I]. Taxonomic features and morphometry of females of Cymbasoma janetae.
Planche 7 Issued from : F. Üstün, T. Terbiyik Kurt & E. Suarez-Morales in Crustaceana, 2014, 87 (11-12). [p.1404, Table I (continued)]. Taxonomic features and morphometry of females of Cymbasoma janetae.
For Mageed (2010, p.520) the species is most similar to C. longispinosum (Bourne, 1890), also similar to C. morii Sekiguchi, 1982, C. chelemense Suarez-Morales & Escamilla, 1997, and C. californiense Suarez-Morales & Palomares-Garcià, 1999 mainly in the presence of the dorsal cuticular wrinkles on the genital double-somite in addition to the other characters that distinguish it from C. longispinosum. This form is assignable to Cymbasima longispinosum species-group.