|
|
 |
Fiche d'espèce de Copépode |
|
|
Calanoida ( Ordre ) |
|
|
|
Diaptomoidea ( Superfamille ) |
|
|
|
Acartiidae ( Famille ) |
|
|
|
Acartia ( Genre ) |
|
|
|
Odontacartia ( Sous-Genre ) |
|
|
| |
Acartia (Odontacartia) lilljeborgi Giesbrecht, 1889 (F,M) | |
| | | | | | | Syn.: | ? Acartia denticornis Brady, 1883 (Figs.F,M);
Acartia fariai Oliveira, 1945 (p.459);
Lahmeyeria turrisphari Oliveira, 1947 (p.463) | | | | Ref.: | | | Giesbrecht, 1892 (p.508, 523, figs.F,M); Giesbrecht & Schmeil, 1898 (p.155); Steuer, 1923 (p.26, figs.F,M); Carvalho, 1952 a (p.150, Rem., F,M, figs.M); Rose, 1956 (p.462); Bowman, 1965 (p.149, figs. Head: rostral filaments, Rem.); Gonzalez & Bowman, 1965 (p.255, figs.F,M, Rem.); Björnberg, 1972 (p.65, figs., Rem.N & juv.1 à 4); Björnberg & al., 1981 (p.661, figs.F,M, Rem.); Sazhina, 1985 (p.81, figs.N); Barthélémy, 1999 (p.858, 865, figs.F); 1999 a (p.9, Fig.27, E-F); Bradford-Grieve & al., 1999 (p.886, 962, figs.F,M); Pombu & Martinelli-Filho, 2012 (p.249, figs.1, 2, anomalies); Tello-Cetina & al., 2013 (p.925, genetic structure); Srinui & al., 2019, p.90, Rem. F, M); Lee S. & al., 2019 (p.85, Table 3.. |  issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19. [Taf.43, Fig.1]. Female: 1, habitus (dorsal).
|
 issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19. [Taf.43, Fig.19]. Male: 19, last thoracic segment and urosome (dorsal).
|
 issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19. [Taf.30, Fig.30]. Male: 30, P5 (Pd = right leg; Ps = left leg).
|
 Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. – Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19 , Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf.30, Fig.8]. Male: 8, right A1.
|
 Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. – Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19 , Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf.30, Fig.20]. Female: 20, P5.
|
 issued from : R.-M. Bathélémy in J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 1999, 79. [p.865, Fig.8, E]. Scanning electon miccrograph. Female (Punta Salinas, Ecuador): E, genital double-somite (ventral). Scale bar: 0.050 mm. Symbols: * = cuticular protuberance between the genital slits; gs = genital slit.
|
 Issued from : G.S. Brady in Rep. Scient. Results Voy. Challenger, Zool., 1883, 8 (23). [Pl. XXXII, Figs.15, 16]. With doubt as Acartia denticornis. Female: 16, P5. Male: 15, P5.
|
 Erratum: read Srinui and not Siruani. Female: 1 - Genital double-somite having paired posterodorsal processes. 2 - 2nd segment of A1 without strong curved processes. 3 - Exopod of P5 not thickened proximally. 4 - Caudal ramus longer than wide by at most ca 2 times 2nd free urosomite with small spinules dorsally and posteriorly . 5 - 5th to 7th segments of A1, each with posterior hook; genital double-somite with pair of small processes dorsally. Male: 1 - Urosomite 3 without spine-like processes dorsally. 2 - Urosomite 4 with prominence dorsally; number of dorsal prominences on urosomite 4 fewer than 5. 3 - Terminal exopodal segment of left P5 with single element. 4 - Terminal element of left P5 as fine seta.
|
 Issued from : S. Lee, H.Y. Soh & W. Lee in ZooKeys, 2019, 893. [p.84, Table 3]. Acartia (Odontacartia) lilljeborgi: Morphological characters. Compare with other Odontacartia species. Nota: 1 - Presence of spines on 1st to 2rd segments of female A1 ... 2. 2 - Small spinule row present on dorsal surface of female genital double-somite.
| | | | | Ref. compl.: | | | Sewell, 1948 (p.392, 454, 573); Fagetti, 1962 (p.37); Gaudy, 1963 (p.29, Rem.); Björnberg, 1963 (p.61, Rem.); Fleminger, 1967 a (tabl.1); Brinton & al., 1986 (p.228, Table 1); Zamora-Sanchez & Gomez-Aguirre, 1986 (p.340); Cervantes-Duarte & Hernandez-Trujillo, 1989 (tab.3); Lindo, 1991 (tab.3); Lopes, 1994 (tab.1); Suarez Morales, 1994 b (tab.1); Palomares Garcia & Vera, 1995 (tab.1); Roff & al., 1995 (p.165,Table 5: naupllii vs. bacteriophagy/picoplankton); Eskinazi-Sant'Anna & Tundisi, 1996 (tab.1, 2); Webber & al., 1996 (tab.1); Lenz & al., 1996 (p.1, behaviour); Lopes & al., 1998 (p.195); Hopcroft & al., 1998 (tab.2); Suarez-Morales & Gasca, 1998 a. (p107); Lavaniegos & Gonzalez-Navarro, 1999 (p.239, Appx.1); Lopes & al., 1999 (p.215, tab.1); Neumann-Leitao & al., 1999 (p.153, tab.2); Gomez-Gutierrez & al., 1999 (p.2227, egg production, growth rates); Alvarez-Silva & Gomez-Aguirre, 2000 (p.163: tab.2); Ara, 2001 a (p.205, egg production); 2001 b (p.121); Dunbar & Webber, 2003 (tab.1); Krumme & Liang, 2004 (p.407, tab.1); Ara, 2004 (p.179, figs. 3, 4, 5); Alvarez-Silva & al., 2005 (p.39); Lopez-Ibarra & Palomares-Garcia, 2006 (p.63, Tabl. 1, seasonal abundance vs El-Niño, Rem.: p.67, 69, 70, 72, 74); Sterza & Fernades, 2006 (p.95, Table 1, occurence), Rem.: p.103; Dias & Araujo, 2006 (p.27, Rem., chart); Youn & Choi, 2007 (p.222: Table1, egg production); Neumann-Leitao & al., 2008 (p.799: Tab.II, fig.6); Morales-Ramirez & Suarez-Morales, 2008 (p.513, 517); Ayon & al., 2008 (p.238, Table 4: Peruvian samples); Waggett & Buskey, 2008 (p.111, Table 1); Miyashita & al., 2009 (p.815, Tabl.II); Magalhaes & al., 2009 (p.187, Table 1, %); Hernandez-Trujillo & al., 2010 (p.913, Table 2); Medellin-Mora & Navas S., 2010 (p.265, Tab. 2); Magris & al., 2011 (p.260, abundance, interannual variability); Costa R.G. da & al;, 2011 (p.364, Table 1, seasonal occurrence); Escamilla & al., 2011 (p.379, spatial & seasonal abundance, competition); Magalhaes & al., 2011 (p.1520, seasonal abundance); Almeida LR. & al., 2012 (p.13, Table 1, abundance); Miyashita & al., 2012 (p.1557, Table 2: occurrence); Palomares-Garcia & al., 2013 (p.1009, Table I, abundance vs environmental factors); in CalCOFI regional list (MDO, Nov. 2013; M. Ohman, pers. comm.); Garbosa da Costa & al., 2013 (p.756, Table 1, abundance vs tide); Alvarez-Silva & Torres-Alvarado, 2013 (p.241, Table1: seasonal abundance); Mendoza Portillo, 2013 (p.37: Fig.7, seasonal dominance); Ortega & al., 2014 (p.495, Table I, %); Bonecker & a., 2014 (p.445, Table II: frequency, horizontal & vertical distributions); Fuentes-Reinés & Suarez-Morales, 2015 (p.369, Table 1, Rem. p.372); Dias & al., 2015 (p.483, Table 2, abundance, biomass, production); Araujo & al., 2016 (p.1, Table 3, 5, abundance, %); Ortega & al., 2017 (p.123, fig. 1, 4, 6, Table 2, abundance, %); Marques-Rojas & Zoppi de Roa, 2017 (p.495, Table 1); Atique & al., 2017 (p.1, Table 1); Jerez-Guerrero & al., 2017 (p.1046, Table 1: temporal occurrence); Palomares-Garcia & al., 2018 (p.178, fig.3: relative frequency, Table 1) | | | | NZ: | 5 | | |
|
Carte de distribution de Acartia (Odontacartia) lilljeborgi par zones géographiques
|
| | |  able 1Carte de 1996 | |
 issued from : C. de O. Dias & A.V. Araujo in Atlas Zoopl. reg. central da Zona Econ. exclus. brasileira, S.L. Costa Bonecker (Edit), 2006, Série Livros 21. [p.27].
Chart of occurrence in Brazilian waters (sampling between 22°-23° S).
Nota: sampling only 2 specimens. |
 Issued from : A. Magalhaes, D.S.B. Nobre, R.S.C. Bessa, L.C.C. Pereira & R.M. da Costa in J. Coastal Res., 2011, SI 64. [p.1522, Fig.2].
Seasonal variation in the abundance, biomass and productivity of Acartia lilljeborgii in the Taperaçu estuary (00°55'06.8''S, 46°44'00''W) in July (rainy season) and October (dry season), 2004, during spring tides (flood and ebb periods), at 3-hour intervals over 24-hour period. with a plankton net (300 µm mesh aperture). |
 Issued from : J.C. Roff, J.T. Turner, M.K. Webber & R.R. Hopcroft in Aquat. microb. Ecol., 1995, 9. [p.170, Table 5].
Summary observations on naupliar bacterovory on FLB (fluorescently labelled bacteria) a partir Escherichia coli (±0.7 µm3 cell volume) in Kingston Harbour and Lime Cay (Jamaica).
Fluorescence levels: 0 = no materal for observation; - = no fluorescence observed; + = low fluorescence due to few FLB observe; * = highly fluorescence due to many FLB. |
 Issued from : J.C. Roff, J.T. Turner, M.K. Webber & R.R. Hopcroft in Aquat. microb. Ecol., 1995, 9. [p.172, Table 6].
Summary observations on adult female Acartia liljeborgi bacterivory on FLB (fluorescently labelled bacteria) a partir Escherichia coli (±0.7 µm3 cell volume) in Kingston Harbour (Jamaica).
Fluorescence levels: 0 = no materal for observation; - = no fluorescence observed; + = low fluorescence due to few FLB observe; * = highly fluorescence due to many FLB. |
| | | | Loc: | | | Brazil (S, Caraguatatuba Bay, Paranagua Bay, Cananeia Lagoon, Campos Basin, Cabo Frio, Vitorio Bay, Cabo de Sao Tomé, Mucuri estuary, Guarairas lagoon, estuary do Pina, off Natal, Tocantins mouth, Curuça estuary, Ajuruteua Beach, Taperaçu estuary, Caeté Estuary, Amazon estuary, off Amazon River's mouth), Caribbean Colombia, Caribbean Sea (Chetumal Bay, Santa Lucia Is.), Yucatan (Ascension Bay, coast, Chelem lagoon), Porto-Rico, Jamaica (Kingston Harbour, Lime Cay), Venezuela, Colombia (Laguna Navio Quebrado, estuarine area) E Costa Rica, G. of Mexico, Cuba, Viet-Nam (Cauda Bay), S Pacif., Baja California (Bahia Magdalena, W), G. of California, La Paz, Coyuca lagoon, Zihuatanejo Bay, W Costa Rica, Bahia Cupica (Colombia), Ecuador (Guayaquil), Peru, Chile (Valparaiso) | | | | N: | 78 | | | | Lg.: | | | (46) F: 1,4-1,33; M: 1,1; (237) F: 1,4; M: 1,15-1,20; {F: 1,33-1,40; M: 1,10-1,20} | | | | Rem.: | Dans des estuaires, mangroves.
La forme signalée au Viet-Nam par Rose (1956) nécessite confirmation.
La distribution de cette forme est différente des espèces du sous-genre qui sont toutes indo-pacifique W.
Voir aussi les remarques en anglais | | | Dernière mise à jour : 07/06/2021 | |
|
|
 Toute utilisation de ce site pour une publication sera mentionnée avec la référence suivante :
Razouls C., Desreumaux N., Kouwenberg J. et de Bovée F., 2005-2024. - Biodiversité des Copépodes planctoniques marins (morphologie, répartition géographique et données biologiques). Sorbonne Université, CNRS. Disponible sur http://copepodes.obs-banyuls.fr [Accédé le 21 novembre 2024] © copyright 2005-2024 Sorbonne Université, CNRS
|
|
|
|
 lilljeborgi - Planche 1 de figures morphologiques',750,500);)
 lilljeborgi - Planche 2 de figures morphologiques',750,500);)
 lilljeborgi - Planche 3 de figures morphologiques',750,500);)
 lilljeborgi - Planche 4 de figures morphologiques',750,500);){kind=small}
 lilljeborgi - Planche 5 de figures morphologiques',750,500);)
 lilljeborgi - Planche 6 de figures morphologiques',750,500);)
 lilljeborgi - Planche 7 de figures morphologiques',750,500);){kind=small}
 lilljeborgi - Planche 8 de figures morphologiques',750,500);){kind=small}
 lilljeborgi - Planche 9 de figures morphologiques',750,500);)
 lilljeborgi - Carte de distribution 2',650,500);)
 lilljeborgi - Carte de distribution 3',750,500);)
 lilljeborgi - Carte de distribution 4',750,500);)
 lilljeborgi - Carte de distribution 5',750,500);){kind=small}
 lilljeborgi - Carte de distribution 6',750,500);){kind=small}
 lilljeborgi - Planche 1 de figures morphologiques){kind=link}
 lilljeborgi - Planche 2 de figures morphologiques){kind=link}
 lilljeborgi - Planche 3 de figures morphologiques){kind=link}
 lilljeborgi - Planche 4 de figures morphologiques){kind=link}
 lilljeborgi - Planche 5 de figures morphologiques){kind=link}
 lilljeborgi - Planche 6 de figures morphologiques){kind=link}
 lilljeborgi - Planche 7 de figures morphologiques){kind=link}
 lilljeborgi - Planche 8 de figures morphologiques){kind=link}
 lilljeborgi - Planche 9 de figures morphologiques){kind=link}
 lilljeborgi - Carte de distribution 2){kind=link}
 lilljeborgi - Carte de distribution 3){kind=link}
 lilljeborgi - Carte de distribution 4){kind=link}
 lilljeborgi - Carte de distribution 5){kind=link}
 lilljeborgi - Carte de distribution 6){kind=link}