Aetideus armatus - Fiche d'espèce - Copépodes planctoniques marins

Aetideus armatus Boeck, 1872 (F,M)

Taxonomy

Ordre Calanoida

détails

Superfamille Clausocalanoidea

détails

Famille Aetideidae

détails

Genre Aetideus

détails liste des espèces pour ce genre

Abréviations ou symboles

Synonymie

Pseudocalanus armatus Boeck, 1872; Brady, 1878 (p.46, figs.F);
Aetidius armatus : Brady, 1883 (part., p.76, figs.F); Sars, 1901 a (1903) (p.25, figs.F,M); T. Scott, 1902 (p.451, Rem.); Wolfenden, 1911 (p.209, figs.F); With, 1915 (p.75, figs.F); Hardy & Gunther, 1935 (1936) (p.157, Rem.); Maclellan D.C., 1967 (p.101, 102: occurrence); De Decker, 1968 (p.45); Falkenhaug & al., 1997 (p.449, spatio-temporal pattern); Hunt, 2004 (p.1, 43, Table 3.2); Papastephanou & al., 2006 (p.3078, Table 3);
Aethidius armatus: Cleve, 1904 a (p.185); A. tenuirostris Wolfenden, 1904 (p.116, Rem.);
Paraetideus armatus : Paulsen, 1909;
no A. armatus : Giesbrecht, 1892 (p.213); Giesbrecht & Schmeil, 1898 (p.31);
Undinopsis armatus : Shih & Young, 1995 (p.67);
no A. armatus : Esterly, 1905 (p.145, figs.F); Campbell, 1929 (p.311); ? Tanaka, 1957 a (p.31, figs.F,M); Aetideus armatus s.l. : Brinton & al., 1986 (p.228, Table 1);

Références

Liste des auteurs étudiés

Thompson & Scott, 1903 (p.233, 244); Farran, 1908 b (p.28); A. Scott, 1909 (p.37, figs.F); Lysholm, 1913 (p.5); Pesta, 1920 (p.507); Lysholm & Nordgaard, 1921 (p.11); Sars, 1925 (p.41); Farran, 1926 (p.246); 1929 (p.208, 228); Sewell, 1929 (p.99); Sciacchitano, 1930 (p.12, Rem.); Wilson, 1932 a (p.45, figs.F,M); Rose, 1933 a (p.80, figs.F,M); Jespersen, 1934 (p.52); Farran, 1936 a (p.87); Jespersen, 1940 (p.17); Mori, 1937 (1964) (p.38, figs. juv.F,M); Davis, 1949 (p.25, figs.F); Brodsky, 1950 (1967) (p.144, figs.F,M); Vervoort, 1952 a (n°42, p.3, figs.F,M); 1957 (p.44, Rem.); Vervoort, 1963 b (p.122, Rem.); Gaudy, 1963 (p.22); Matthews, 1964 (p.24, Rem.); Chen & Zhang, 1965 (p.50, figs.F); Owre & Foyo, 1967 (p.43, figs.F,M); Mazza, 1967 (p.108, 138, figs.juv., F,M, Rem.); 1968 (p.531, figs.); Park, 1968 (p.544, Rem.); Ramirez, 1969 (p.57, figs.F,M, Rem.); Vaupel-Klein, 1970 (p.4, 10, Rem.); Bradford, 1971 (p.15, figs.F, Rem); 1972 (p.36, figs.F,M); Razouls, 1972 (p.94, Annexe: p.39, figs.F,M); Park, 1974 (p.215, Rem.); Arcos, 1975 (p.15, figs.F,M); Park, 1978 (p.104); Dawson & Knatz, 1980 (p.6, figs.F,M); Björnberg & al., 1981 (p.604, 630, figs.F,M); Zheng Zhong & al., 1984 (1989) (p.235, figs.F); Razouls, 1994 (p.62, figs.F,M); Markhaseva, 1996 (p.14, figs.F,M, Rem.); Chihara & Murano, 1997 (p.682, Pl.32: F); Bradford-Grieve & al., 1999 (p.879, 920, figs.F,M); G. Harding, 2004 (p.53, 54, figs.F ,M); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.544, figs.F,M, Rem.); Blanco-Bercial & al., 2011 (p.103, Table 1, Biol. mol, phylogeny)

Figures

Planche 1 issued from : J.M. Bradford in N.Z. Jl Mar. Freshw. Res., 1971, 5 (1). [p.17, Fig.3]. From SW Africa (21°-35°S).
Male : a, habitus (dorsal); b, P5; c, caudal ramus; d, 3rd exopod segment of P3.
Nota: Posterior thoracic points extend up to (but not past), the posterior border of urosomal segment 1. Width: length ratio of caudal rami is 1: 2.58-2.70. Terminal seta on P2-P4 with 24, 22 and 18 teeth respectively.

Female: e, habitus (dorsal); f, idem (lateral right side); g, rostrum; h, genital segment and posterior thoracic points (lateral left side); i, idem (lateral right side); j, rostrum.
Nota: Posterior thoracic points just passed the posterior border of the genital segment, seminal receptacles with a thick, short tube joining the dorsal and ventral sacs. Rostrum: width/depth about 0.86-1.3 (falling within the range of the 2 specimens from Norway). Anterior cephalothorax vaulted, heavily chitinized and when viewed laterally indented above the base of A1 (characteristic not noted in the Norwegian specimens).

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 2 of morphological figures

Planche 2 issued from : Sars G.O. in An Account of the Crustacea of Norway. Vol. IV. Copepoda Calanoida. Published by the Bergen Museum, 1903. [Pl. XIII]. As Aetidius armatus.
Female & Male.
C = forehead (lateral); R = rostrum (frontal view);

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 3 of morphological figures

Planche 3 issued from : Sars G.O. in An Account of the Crustacea of Norway. Vol. IV. Copepoda Calanoida. Published by the Bergen Museum, 1903. [Pl. XIV]. As Aetidius armatus.
Female & Male.
M = Md; m = Mx1; mp1 = Mx2; mp2 = Mxp.

Planche 4 issued from : J.M. Bradford in N.Z. Jl Mar. Freshw. Res., 1971, 5 (1). [p.15, Fig.2].
Female (drawn from mounted specimens from Sars' collection): a, A2; b, Md (cutting edge); c, Md (mandibular palp); d, Mx1; e, Mx2; f, Mxp; g, P1; h, P2; i, P4.

Nota: Anterior integument covered with very small chitinous thickenings (visible only under phase contrast). Terminal spines of P2-P4 with 16, 17, 15 teeth respectively (although the numbers vary slightly between specimens). Seminal receptacle similar to A. australis

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 5 of morphological figures

Planche 5 issued from : F.C. Ramirez in Contr. Inst. Biol. mar., Buenos Aires, 1969, 98. [p.56, Lam. IX, figs.57, 58, 61].
Female (from off Mar del Plata): 57, habitus (lateral left side); 58, idem (dorsal).

Male: 61, P5.
Scale bars in mm: 0.6 (57, 58); 0.1 (61).

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 6 of morphological figures

Planche 6 issued from : A. Scott in Siboga-Expedition, 1909, XIX a. [Plate IV, Figs.14-25].
Female (from Indonesia-Malaysia): 14, habitus (dorsal); 15, forehead (lateral); 16, last thoracic and genital segments (left side); 17, rostrum; 18, A1; 19, A2; 20, Md; 21, Mx2; 22, Mxp; 23, P1; 24, P2; 25, P3.

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 7 of morphological figures

Planche 7 issued from : R.N. Wolfenden in Die Marinen Copepoden der Deutschen Südpolar-Expedition 1901-1903, 1911. [p.208, Fig.4]. As Aetidius armatus.
Female: a-b, habitus (dorsal and lateral, respectively); c, rostrum

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 8 of morphological figures

Planche 8 issued from : J.M. Bradford in Mem. N. Z. Oceonogr. Inst., 1972, 54. [p.37, Fig.6 (1-3)].
Female (from Kaikoura, New Zealand): 1, habitus (lateral).

Male: 2, habitus (dorsal); 3, P5.

Scale bars: 1 mm (1, 2); 0.1 mm (3).

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 9 of morphological figures

Planche 9 issued from : C. Razouls in Th. Doc. Etat Fac. Sc. Paris VI, 1972, Annexe. [Fig.41, A, C].
Female: A, habitus (lateral).

Male: C, P5.

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 10 of morphological figures

Planche 10 issued from : D.F.R. Arcos in Gayana, Zool., 1975, 32. [Lam.IV, Figs.29-34].
Female (from Bahia de Concepcion, Chile): 29-30, habitus (dorsal and lateral, respectively); 31, last thoracic segment and urosome (dorsal); 32, genital segment (lateral, left side); 34, exopodite segment 3 of P4.

male: 33, P5.

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 11 of morphological figures

Planche 11 issued from : D.F.R. Arcos in Gayana, Zool., 1975, 32. [Lam.III, Fig.28].
Male: 28, last thoracic segment and urosome (dorsal).

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 12 of morphological figures

Planche 12 Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. – Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892. Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf. 36 , Figs.7, 8, 9]. As Aëtidius armatus.
Female: 7, forehead (lateral); 8, urosome (ventral); 9, last thoracic segment and urosome (lateral, left side).

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 13 of morphological figures

Planche 13 Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. – Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892. Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf. 36 , Fig.6]. As Aëtidius armatus.
Male: 6, habitus (dorsal).

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 14 of morphological figures

Planche 14 issued from : C. With in The Danish Ingolf-Expedition, 1915, III (4). [p.75, Text-Fig.16]. As Aetidius armatus.
Female (from 61°-67°N, 9°-55°W):distal part of prosome and urosome (lateral, left side).

Planche 15 issued from : C. With in The Danish Ingolf-Expedition, 1915, III (4). [Pl. II, Figs.1a, 1b]. As Aetidius armatus.
Female: 1a, genital segment (left side); 1b, same (ventral).

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 16 of morphological figures

Planche 16 issued from : C. With in The Danish Ingolf-Expedition, 1915, III (4). [Pl. II, Figs.1c, 1d]. As Aetidius armatus.
Female: 1c, basipod of left P4 (posterior); 1d, lamina labialis.
Nota: The basipod 2 of P4 has, in addition to marginal row of setae, posteriorly and just proximally to the inner seta a transverse row of 4 short spines (1c), which corresponds to the two spines mentioned by Giesbrecht but not by Sars and Scott. Glandular pores were found at the base of outer seta of exopod 2 and outer seta of exopod 3 in the three posterior pair of legs, and in addition to these a pore was found at the base of outer seta of exopod 1 in P3-P4.
The lamina labialis and the setae in front of it have a structure as shown in fig. 1d.

Planche 17 issued from : G. Harding in Key to the adullt pelagic calanoid copepods found over the continental shelf of the Canadian Atlantic coast. Bedford Inst. Oceanogr., Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, 2004. [p.53].
Female.

P1: Exopodite 1 without spine on the outer margin (arrowed). P2: Endopodal segments 1 and 2 incompletely separated (arrowed).

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 18 of morphological figures

Planche 18 issued from : H.B. Owre & M. Foyo in Fauna Caribaea, 1, Crustacea, 1: Copepoda. Copepods of the Florida Current. [p.26, Fig.122].
Female: 122, forehead (lateral).

Planche 19 issued from : J.M. Bradford in N.Z. Jl Mar. Freshw. Res., 1971, 5 (1). [p.18, Fig.4, a]. [modified C.R]
Rostrum width : depth plotted against rostrum depth (c) for Aetideus armatus. SA: Southern African specimens.
Compare with A. australis, A. truncatus, A. divergens and A. pseudarmatus.

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 20 of morphological figures

Planche 20 issued from : E.L. Markhaseva in Trudy Zool. Inst. RAN, St. Petersburg, 1996, 268. [p.16, Fig.4].
Female (from 48°33'N, 18°52'W).

Planche 21 Aetideus armatus female: 1 - Posterior corners of last thoracic segment prolonged into points.
2 - Posterior corners of last thoracic segment not prolonged into wing-like lobes. Points not reaching the middle of urosomal segment 2. Anterior part of cephalon without crest.
3 - Basipodite of right P1 without external tooth-like projection distally. Coxopodite of P4 usually with spinules near the base of internal seta.
4 - Points of posterior corners reaching or exceeding posterior border of genital segment.
5 - Spermatheca with short duct connecting its dorsal and ventral parts.

Planche 22 Aetideus armatus male:
1 - Last thoracic segment with points.
2 - Points not exceeding posterior border of urosomal segment 1 (in dorsal view).
3 - 2nd segment of P5 2.3-3.1 times as long as wide.
4 - Exopodite 3 of P3 with terminal spine shorter than the segment itself.

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 23 of morphological figures

Planche 23 Issued from : C. Séret in Thesis UPMC, Paris 6. 1979 [Pl. XI, figs.63-65].
Female (from off N Kerguelen Is.): 63-64, habitus (dorsal and lateral, respectively); 65, forehead showing rostrum (ventral view).

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 24 of morphological figures

Planche 24 Issued from : C. Razouls in Ann. Inst. océanogr., Paris, 1994, 70 (1). [p.2562]. Caractéristiques morphologiques de Aetideus armatus femelle et mâle adultes.
Terminologie et abbréviations: voir à Calanus propinquus.

Nota: Bradford (1971, p.12 & suiv.) montre qu'il existe des différences parmi les formes identifiées comme A. armatus par divers auteurs.
Chez la femelle, les critères de différenciation des espèces portent sur le rostre, la longueur des pointes thoraciques postérieures, des A1, et la spermathèque; Chez le mâle, le rostre, la longueur des pointes thoraciques postérieures, les proportions des rames caudales et des segments 2, 3, 4 de la P5.

Species Aetideus armatus - Planche 25 of morphological figures

Planche 25 Issued from : C. Razouls in Ann. Inst. océanogr., Paris, 1994, 70 (1). [p.62]. Caractéristiques morphologiques comparées entre A. armatus, A. australis, A. pseudarmatus, A. giesbrechti, A. arcuatus, femelle et mâle adultes.
Terminologie et abbréviations: voir à Calanus propinquus.

Références complémentaires

Liste des auteurs étudiés

Pearson, 1906 (p.11, Rem.); Rose, 1925 (p.152); Wilson, 1942 a (p.170); Lysholm & al., 1945 (p.11); Sewell, 1948 (p.347, 499, 508, 512, 516, 525, 545, 549, 555, 559, 566); C.B. Wilson, 1950 (p.159); Gundersen, 1953 (p.1, 26, seasonal abundance); Østvedt, 1955 Table 3, p.59); Minoda, 1958 (p.253, Table 1, abundance); Yamazi, 1958 (p.148, Rem.); Fagetti, 1962 (p.17); Cervigon, 1962 (p.181, tables: abundance distribution); Grice & Hart, 1962 (p.287, table 3); Gaudy, 1962 (p.93, 99, Rem.: p.105); Duran, 1963 (p.15); V.N. Greze, 1963 a (tabl.2); Shmeleva, 1963 (p.141); Grice, 1963 a (p.495); Gaudy, 1963 (p.22, Rem.); Unterüberbacher, 1964 (p.21, Rem.M); De Decker & Mombeck, 1964 (p.11); Shmeleva, 1965 b (p.1350, lengths-volume -weight relation); Grice & Hulsemann, 1965 (p.223); Furuhashi, 1966 a (p.295, vertical distribution in Kuroshio region, Table 9); Mazza, 1966 (p.70); Pavlova, 1966 (p.43); Matthews, 1967 (p.159, Table 1, Rem.); Fleminger, 1967 a (tabl.1); Grice & Hulsemann, 1967 (p.14); Berdugo & Kimor, 1968 (p.448); Dowidar & El-Maghraby, 1970 (p.267); Park, 1970 (p.475); Shih & al., 1971 (p.31, 142); Deevey, 1971 (p.224); Gamulin, 1971 (p.382, tab.3); Carli, 1971 (p.373, tab.2); Apostolopoulou, 1972 (p.327, 345); Boucher & Thiriot, 1972 (p.47, Tableau 4); Roe, 1972 (p.277, tabl.1, tabl.2); 1972 a (p.332); Bainbridge, 1972 (p.61, Appendix Table I: vertical distribution vs day/night); Björnberg, 1973 (p.326, 384); Vives & al., 1975 (p.41, tab.II, III, IV); Vives, 1976 (p.104); Deevey & Brooks, 1977 (p.256, tab.2, Station "S"); Carter, 1977 (1978) (p.35); Arashkevich, 1978 (p.118, Table: diets); Dessier, 1979 (p.204); Vaissière & Séguin, 1980 (p.23, tab.1); Pipe & Coombs, 1980 (p.223, figs. 1, 2, table 1, vertical distribution); Vives, 1982 (p.290); Kovalev & Schmeleva, 1982 (p.83); Huntley & al., 1983 (p.143, Table 2); Brenning, 1983 (p.1, spatial distribution, T-S diagram, Rem.); Tremblay & Anderson, 1984 (p.3); De Decker, 1984 (p.316); Guangshan & Honglin, 1984 (p.118, tab.); Roe, 1984 (p.356); Scotto di Carlo & al., 1984 (p.1044); Tremblay & Anderson, 1984 (p.3); Sameoto, 1984 (p.767, vertical migration); Brenning, 1985 a (p.28, Table 2); Regner, 1985 (p.11, Rem.: p.30, as Aetidus ); Madhupratap & Haridas, 1986 (p.105, tab.1); Lozano Soldevilla & al., 1988 (p.58); Jimenez-Perez & Lara-Lara, 1988; Hernandez-Trujillo, 1989 a (tab.1); Cervantes-Duarte & Hernandez-Trujillo, 1989 (tab.3); Fransz & al., 1991 (p.9); Yoo, 1991 (tab.1); Hernandez-Trujillo, 1991 (1993) (tab.I); Hattori, 1991 (tab.1, Appendix); Hays & al., 1994 (tab.1); Kouwenberg, 1994 (tab.1); Hajderi, 1995 (p.542); Shih & Young, 1995 (p.66); Errhif & al., 1997 (p.422); Park & Choi, 1997 (Appendix); Suarez-Morales & Gasca, 1998 a (p107); Hure & Krsinic, 1998 (p.100); Padmavati & al., 1998 (p.349); Siokou-Frangou, 1999 (p.476); Halvorsen & Tande, 1999 (p.279, tab.2, 3, Rem.: p.282); Fernandez-Alamo & al., 2000 (p.1139, Appendix); Lapernat, 2000 (tabl. 3, 4); Razouls & al., 2000 (p.343, Appendix); Seridji & Hafferssas, 2000 (tab.1); Lopez-Salgado & al., 2000 (tab.1); Moraitou-Apostolopoulou & al., 2000 (tab.I); d'Elbée, 2001(tabl. 1); Holmes, 2001 (p.45); Hunt & al., 2001 (p.374, tab.1); Beaugrand & al., 2002 (p.1692); Beaugrand & al., 2002 (p.179, figs.5, 6); Sameoto & al., 2002 (p.12); Vukanic, 2003 (139, tab.1); CPR, 2004 (p.49, fig.134); Berasategui & al., 2005 (p.313, fig.2); Hop & al., 2006 (p.182, Table 4); Isari & al., 2006 (p.241, tab.II); Kosobokova & al., 2007 (p.929: Tab.7); Valdés & al., 2007 (p.103: tab.1); Khelifi-Touhami & al., 2007 (p.327, Table 1); Castro & al., 2007 (p.486, fig.3, 5, Table 1, 2, 3); Cabal & al., 2008 (289, Table 1); Morales-Ramirez & Suarez-Morales, 2008 (p.517); Fernandes, 2008 (p.465, Tabl.2); Wishner & al., 2008 (p.163, Table 2, fig.8, oxycline); Ayon & al., 2008 (p.238, Table 4: Peruvian samples); Gaard & al., 2008 (p.59, Table 1, N Mid-Atlantic Ridge); Raybaud & al., 2008 (p.1765, Table A1); Galbraith, 2009 (pers. comm.); Licandro & Icardi, 2009 (p.17, Table 4); C.E. Morales & al., 2010 (p.158, Table 1); Schnack-Schiel & al., 2010 (p.2064, Table 2: E Atlantic subtropical/tropical); Hidalgo & al., 2010 (p.2089, Table 2); Mazzocchi & Di Capua, 2010 (p.423); Medellin-Mora & Navas S., 2010 (p.265, Tab. 2); Mazzocchi & al., 2011 (p.1163, fig.6, long-term time-series 1984-2006); Andersen N.G. & al., 2011 (p.71, Fig.3: abundance); Isari & al., 2011 (p.51, Table 2, abundance vs distribution); Selifonova, 2011 a (p.77, Table 1, alien species in Black Sea); Shiganova & al., 2012 (p.61, Table 4): Salah S. & al., 2012 (p.155, Tableau 1); Zizah & al., 2012 (p.79, Tableau I); Miloslavic & al., 2012 (p.165, Table 2, transect distribution); Brugnano & al., 2012 (p.207, Table 2); Mazzocchi & al., 2012 (p.135, annual abundance 1984-2006); Alvarez-Fernandez & al., 2012 (p.21, Rem.: Table 1); Hidalgo & al., 2012 (p.134, Table 2, 3, figs.6, 8, occurrence vs hydrology); Belmonte & al., 2013 (p.222, Table 2, abundance vs stations); Palomares-Garcia & al., 2013 (p.1009, Table I, V, abundance vs environmental factors); in CalCOFI regional list (MDO, Nov. 2013; M. Ohman, pers. comm.); Sobrinho-Gonçalves & al., 2013 (p.713, Table 2, fig.8, seasonal abundance vs environmental conditions); Bode M. & al., 2013 (p.1, Table 1, respiration rate & ETS activity); Fierro Gonzalvez, 2014 (p.1, Tab. 3, 5, occurrence, abundance); Zaafa & al., 2014 (p.67, Table I, occurrence): Zakaria & al., 2016 (p.1, Table 1, Rem.); Benedetti & al., 2016 (p.159, Table I, fig.1, functional characters); Jerez-Guerrero & al., 2017 (p.1046, Table 1: temporal occurrence); El Arraj & al., 2017 (p.272, table 2); Benedetti & al., 2018 (p.1, Fig.2: ecological functional group); Belmonte, 2018 (p.273, Table I: Italian zones); Chaouadi & Hafferssas, 2018 (p.913, Table II: occurrence); Palomares-Garcia & al., 2018 (p.178, Table 1: occurrence no seen in La Paz); Acha & al., 2020 (p.1, Table 3: occurrence % vs ecoregions, Table 5: indicator ecoregions).

Distribution

NZ: 24

Carte de distribution de Aetideus armatus par zones géographiques

Liste des espèces pour la sous-zone North Sea de la Zone 9

Distribution map of Aetideus armatus for the Zone Mediterranean Sea, Black Sea

Distribution map of Aetideus armatus for the Zone Indian Ocean

Distribution map of Aetideus armatus for the Zone China Seas, Vietnam

Distribution map of Aetideus armatus for the Zone Antarctic and for the Zone Sub-Antarctic

Cartes et graphiques additionels

Carte 6 issued from : A.A. Shmeleva in Bull. Inst. Oceanogr., Monaco, 1965, 65 (n°1351). [Table 6: 17 ]. Aetideus armatus (from South Adriatic).
Dimensions, volume and Weight wet. Means for 50-60 specimens. Volume and weight calculated by geometrical method. Assumed that the specific gravity of the Copepod body is equal to 1, then the volume will correspond to the weight.

Carte 7 issued from : U. Brenning in Wiss. Z. Wilhelm-Pieck-Univ. Rostock - 32. Jahrgang 1983. Mat.-nat. wiss. Reihe, 5. [p.1, Figs.1, 2].
Spatial distribution and T-S Diagram for Aetideus armatus, Aetideus giesbrechti and Aetideopsis carinata from 8° S - 26° N; 16°- 20° W.

Espèce Aetideus armatus - Carte de distribution 8

Carte 8 Issued from : C. Séret in Thesis 3ème Cycle, UPMC, Paris 6. 1979, Annexe. [p.29].
Geographical occurrences of Aetideus armatus in the Indian Ocean and Antarctic zone. [after publications from: Brady, 1883, 1918; Thompson, 1900; Wolfenden, 1908, 1911; With , 1915; Rosendorn, 1917; Farran, 1929; Sewell, 1929, 1947; Brady & Gunther, 1935; Steuer, 1929, 1392, 1933; Ommaney, 1936; Vervoort, 1957; Tanaka, 1960; Brodsky, 1964; Seno, 1966; Andrews, 1966; Grice & Hulsemann, 1967; Seno, 1966; Frost & Fleminger, 1968; Voronina, 1970; Zverva, 1972].

C. Séret notes the occurrence at station 46°S, 64°E.

Carte 9 Issued from : M. Bode, A. Schukat, W. Hagen & H. Auel in J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 2013, 444. [p.3, Table 1].
Dry mass, individual respiration rate and ETS activity from the northern Benguela Current upwelling system along transects at 23°S and 26°40'S, off Walvisbay and Lüderitz (Namibia).
Relationship between individual ETS activities and individual respiration rates; mean ETS activities with standard deviations are plotted again mean respiration rates (Cf. in Calanoides natalis. The letter besides each point identifies the associated species in Table 1 (b) for this species) in the same authors.
Cf. Table 1: Dry mass, individual respiration rate and ETS activity.

Localisations

Glossaire géographique

Cosmopolite: tropical & temperate (except Arct.), Also Antarct. (Atlant. SW, South Georgia, Indian), sub-Antarct. (Atlant. SW, off W Prince Edward, Indian, Kerguelen Is., Pacif. SW, SE), G. of St. Lawrence, off SE Nova Scotia, Davis Strait, Ameralik & Godthaab fjords, Wyville Thomson Ridge, Kongsfjorden (E Spitzbergen), Iceland, off Faroe, Norwegian Sea, Malangen fjord, Raunefjorden, North Sea, English Channel, Mediterannean Sea, W Egyptian coast, Marmara Sea, Black Sea, Arabian Sea, China Seas (Yellow Sea, East China Sea, South China Sea), Japan, Chile (N-S, off Santiago), CalCOFI region, G. of California, Caribbean Colombia (San Andrés y Providencia), Station "S" (32°10'N, 64°30'W), Peru

Citations

N: 239

Dimensions (mm)

Références de auteurs concernant les dimensions

(7) F: 1,93; (14) F: 1,7-1,65; (22) F: 1,95-1,80; M: 1,53-1,4; (34) F: 1,44-1,33; (35) F: 1,84-1,68; (37) F: 2-1,6; M: 1,53-1,3; (38) F: 1,95-1,8; M: 1,53; ? (39) F: 1,82; M: 1,8; (45) F: 1,8; M: 1,45-1,25; (59) F: 2-1,8; M: 1,5-1,4; (65) F: 1,8; M: 1,45; (72) F: 2,02-1,8; (116) F: 1,78; M: 1,56; (199) F: 1,9-1,6; (202) F: 1,78-1,95; M: 1,4-1,56; (204) F: 1,9-1,6; M: 1,5-1,3; (205) F: 2,25-2,15; M: 2,1-2; (244) F: 1,9; (246) F: 1,91-2,12; (290) F: 1,6-1,75; (432) F: 1,98-1,83; (449) F: 1,8; M: 1,45; (866) F: 1,65-1,95; M: 1,4-1,8; (920) F: 1,51; (1109) F: 1,58-1,87; {F: 1,33-2,25; M: 1,25-2,10}

The mean female size is 1.811 mm (n = 42; SD = 0.1884), and the mean male size is 1.534 mm (n = 21; SD = 0.2198). The size ratio (male : female) is approximately 0.83 (n = 13; SD = 0.0707).

Remarques

épi-bathypélagique.
Sampling depth (Antarct., sub-Antarct.) : 0-600; 100-1000 m.

Voir aussi les remarques en anglais

Dernière mise à jour : 25/10/2022