|
|
Oncaea ornata
Taxonomy
Contributor Remarks
Oncaea ornata `form 2´ sensu Boxshall, 1977 was synonymized with O. englishi Heron, 1977 in a detailed study by Malt (1983b; see also Malt 1983a). Heron & Frost (2000 ) agreed with her opinion and pointed out most readily identifiable characters between the two species, which are very similar in morphology, but differ in the proportional lengths of urosomites and endopodal spine lengths on P2-P4. Thus, I wonder why the two forms of O. ornata recorded by Boxshall (1977) are still presented under the name of O. ornata here (together with the detailed remarks by Boxshall, which are out-dated), whereas in the species site of O. englishi the synonymy between O. ornata `form 2´ and O. englishi has been included. I recommend to update the species site of O. ornata correspondingly. | |
By looking over the figures of O. ornata sensu Chen, Zhang & Zu (1974) given above it appears to me that - based on the form of the genital double-somite, the proportional lengths of urosomites and the relative lengths of the distal endopod spines on P3 and P4 - their species looks more similar to O. englishi Heron (which was not known at that time) than to O. ornata. | |










