|
|
Calanoida ( Order ) |
|
|
Diaptomoidea ( Superfamily ) |
|
|
Centropagidae ( Family ) |
|
|
Centropages ( Genus ) |
|
|
| |
Centropages kroyeri Giesbrecht, 1892 (F,M) | |
| | | | | | Ref.: | | | Giesbrecht, 1892 (p.303, 320, 771, figs.F,M); Giesbrecht & Schmeil, 1898 (p.56, Rem. F,M); Thompson & Scott, 1903 (p.234, 247); Pesta, 1920 (p.521); Sars, 1925 (p.206); Rose, 1929 (p.31); 1933 a (p.186, figs.F,M); Massuti Alzamora, 1942 (p.93); Pesta, 1943 (p.25, figs.M); Crisafi, 1960 (p.483, fig.M); Vervoort, 1964 b (p.309); Vilela, 1965 (p.8); Kovalev, 1967 a (p.94, figs.F,M); Vinogradov, 1968 (1970) (p.64); Sazhina & Kovalev, 1971 (p.1099, figs.F,M); Razouls, 1972 (p.94, Annexe: p.63, figs.F,M); Soler & al., 1988 (p.143, Rem.); Mulyadi, 1998 (p.65: Rem.); Bradford-Grieve & al., 1999 (p.884, 951, figs.F,M); Corni & al., 2000 (p.433); Avancini & al., 2006 (p.94, Pl. 63, figs.F,M, Rem.); Vives & Shmeleva, 2007 (p.472, figs.F,M, Rem.); Prusova & al., 2019 (p.525, Table 3). | issued from : Soler Torres E., Del Rio J.G. & Vives F. in Crustaceana, 1988, 55 (2). [Table V, p.143]. Main morphological differences between C. ponticus Karavaev, C. hamatus Lilljeborg and C. kroyeri Giesbrecht (--: no distinct differences with C. ponticus; St: terminal seta).
|
issued from : C. Razouls in Th. Doc. Etat Fac. Sc. Paris VI, 1972, Annexe. [Fig.47, B, B', B'']. Female (from Banyuls, G. of Lion): B, portion of P5; B', genital segment (left laterodorsal view); B\", proximal segments of A1.
|
issued from T. Mori in Zool. Mag. Tokyo, 1929, 41 (486-487). [Pl. VI, Figs.4-7]. Male (from Chosen Strait, Korea-Japan): 4, right P4 (anterior); 5, left P4 (anterior); 6, habitus (dorsal); 7, P5 (anterior).
|
issued from : A.V. Kovalev inAkad. Nauk SSSR, Okeanogr. Komm., 1967. [p.97, Fig.3]. Comparison between urosome female and male P5 from Centropages kröyeri (1) and Centropages ponticus (2).
|
issued from : C. Razouls in Th. Doc. Etat Fac. Sc. Paris VI, 1972, Annexe. [Fig.49, A-B]. Male (from Banyuls): geniculate portion of right A1; B, right leg of P5.
|
issued from : C. Razouls in Th. Doc. Etat Fac. Sc. Paris VI, 1972, Annexe. [Fig.48, A]. Male: A, corners of last thoracic segment and urosome (dorsal).
|
issued from : C. Razouls in Th. Doc. Etat Fac. Sc. Paris VI, 1972, Annexe. [Fig.48, C]. Female (from Banyuls): C, last thoracic segment and urosome (dorsal).
|
Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. - Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19 , Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf.38, Fig.6]. Female: 6, habitus (dorsal).
|
Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. - Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19 , Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf.38, Fig.11]. Female: 11, urosome (dorsal).
|
Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. - Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19 , Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf.38, Fig.14]. Female: 14, urosome (ventral).
|
Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. - Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19 , Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf.17, Fig.40]. Female: 40, P2 (anterior view).
|
Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. - Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19 , Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf.38, Fig.8]. Female: 8, P5.
|
Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. - Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19 , Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf.18, Fig.10]. Male: 10, right A1 (segments 10 to 19-21; dorsal view)
|
Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. - Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19 , Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf.17, Fig.47]. Male: 47, exopod of right P4.
|
Issued from : W. Giesbrecht in Systematik und Faunistik der Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. - Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 1892, 19 , Atlas von 54 Tafeln. [Taf.17, Figs.24, 25]. Male: 24, left P5 (posterior view); 25, right P5 (anterior view).
|
Issued from : I.Yu Prusova, E.A. Galagovets & E.V. Popova in Arthropoda Selecta, 2019, 28 (4). [p.525, Table 3]. Centropages kroyeri: Characters for distinguishing between species of the hamatus group of the genus Centropages. Compare with the species C. hamatus, C. abdominalis C. ponticus, and C. tenuiremis.
| | | | Compl. Ref.: | | Carazzi & Grandori, 1912 (p.11, 38); Rose, 1924 d (p.478); 1925 (p.152); 1925 a (p.8); Sewell, 1932 (p.230); 1933 (p.26); Massuti Alzamora, 1942 (p.93, Rem.); Sewell, 1948 (p.418); Beldescu & al., 1956 (p.63, Table, Size-weight), Kott, 1957 (p.5, 14); Gaudy, 1962 (p.93, 99, Rem.: 110) ; Giron-Reguer, 1963 (p.50); V.N. Greze, 1963 a (tabl.2); Shmeleva, 1963 (p.141); Dimov, 1964 b (p.33, Tableau 1); Mazza, 1966 (p.71); Pavlova, 1966 (p.44); Ehrhardt, 1967 (p.740, fig.16, geographic distribution, Rem.); Porumb, 1968 (p.417); 1968 a (p.509); Dimov, 1968 (p.506) Berdugo & Kimor, 1968 (p.448); Champalbert, 1969 a (p.617); Mullin, 1969 (p.308, Table I: estimates of production); El-Maghraby & Dowidar, 1970 (p.81); Apostolopoulou, 1972 (p.328, 358); Valentin, 1972 (p.349, fig.25, laying); Guglielmo, 1973 (p.399); Lakkis & Abboud, 1976 (p.81); Vaissière & Séguin, 1980 (p.23, tab.1); Kovalev & Shmeleva, 1982 (p.84); Dowidar & El-Maghraby, 1970 (p.267); Vives & al., 1975 (p.47, IV, Rem.); Comaschi Scaramuzza, 1978 (p.17); Vives, 1982 (p.292); Moraitou-Apostolopoulou, 1985 (p.303, occurrence/abundance in E Mediterranean Sea, Rem.: p. 315); Regner, 1985 (p.11, Rem.: p.33); Jansa, 1985 (p.108, Tabl.I, II, III, V); Moraitou-Apostolopoulou & al., 1986 (p.464); Brinton & al., 1986 (p.228, Table 1: Rem.); Comaschi Scaramuzza, 1987 (tab.1); Lozano Soldevilla & al., 1988 (p.59); Hure & Krsinic, 1998 (p.101); Mauchline, 1998 (tab.61); Gilabert & Moreno, 1998 (tab.1, 2); Hanafy & al., 1998 (p.465); Siokou-Frangou, 1999 (p.476); Seridji & Hafferssas, 2000 (tab.1); El-Sherif & Aboul Ezz, 2000 (p.61, Table 3: occurrence); Selifonova, 2000 (p.68, tab.1); Souissi & al., 2001 (p.419abundance vs fish); Bressan & Moro, 2002 (tab.2); Zerouali & Melhaoui, 2002 (p.91, Tableau I, figs.5, 9); Vukanic, 2003 (139, tab.1); Daly Yahia & al., 2004 (p.366, fig.4, tab.1); Shushkina & al., 2004 (p.524, tab.2); Kazmi, 2004 (p.228, as kroeyeri); Licandro & al., 2005 (p.153); Lakkis & al., 2005 (p.152); De Olazabal & al., 2006 (p.966); Valdés & al., 2007 (p.104: tab.1); Busatto, 2007 (p.26, Tab.3); Khelifi-Touhami & al., 2007 (p.327, Table 1); Zakaria, 2007 (p.238, Table 2, spatial distribution); Zakaria & al., 2007 (p.52, Table 1, vs Salinity); Souissi & al., 2008 (p.125, Rem.: eggs); Shmeleva & al., 2008 (p.31, Table 1); Rossi, 2008 (p.90: Tableau XII); Drira & al., 2010 (p.145, Tanl.2); Mazzocchi & Di Capua, 2010 (p.424); Moscatello & al., 2011 (p.80, Table 4); Selifonova, 2011 a (p.77, Table 1, alien species in Black Sea); El-Sherbiny & al., 2011 (p.837, seasonal abundance), Isari & al., 2011 (p.51, Table 2, abundance vs distribution); Mazzocchi & al., 2011 (p.1163, fig.6, long-term time-series 1984-2006); Mazzocchi & al., 2012 (p.135, annual abundance 1984-2006); Uysal & Shmeleva, 2012 (p.909, Table I); Zizah & al., 2012 (p.79, Tableau I, Rem.: p.86); Rekik & al., 2012 (p.336, Table 1, abundance); Miloslavic & al., 2012 (p.165, Table 2, transect distribution); Vidjak & al., 2012 (p.243, Rem.: p.254); Aubry & al., 2012 (p.125, fig.6, 8 b, interannual variation); Gubanova & al., 2013 (in press, Rem. p.2, 4, Table 2); Belmonte & al., 2013 (p.222, Table 2, abundance vs stations); Terbiyik Kurt & Polat, 2013 (p.1163, Table 2, fig.9, seasonal distribution); Lidvanov & al., 2013 (p.290, Table 2, % composition); Pansera & al., 2014 (p.221, Table 2, abundance); Zakaria, 2014 (p.3, Table 1, abundance vs 1960-2000); Zakaria & al., 2016 (p.1, Table 1, 3); Benedetti & al., 2016 (p.159, Table I, fig.1, functional characters); Ben Ltaief & al., 2017 (p.1, Table III, Summer relative abundance); El Arraj & al., 2017 (p.272, table 2); Belmonte, 2018 (p.273, Table I: Italian zones) | | | NZ: | 8 | | |
Distribution map of Centropages kroyeri by geographical zones
|
| | | | | | | | | Chart of 1996 | |
issued from : J.-P. Ehrhardt in Cah. Oceanogr., 1967 (9). [Fig.16]. Occurrence of Centropages kroyeri collected once (24 September 1963 during the night) at 1 station on 39 stations between the southern Tyrrhenian Sea, Tunisia-Sardinia Strait and Cap Bon-west Sicily . |
| | | Loc: | | | Namibia, Morocco-Mauritania, Canary Is., Portugal, Medit. (Alboran Sea, Gulf of Annaba, El Kala shelf, Baleares, Algiers, Banyuls, G. of Lion, Marseille (rare), Toulon harbour, Monaco, Ligurian Sea, G. of Trieste, Lake Faro, G. of Napoli, Milazzo, Strait of Messina, Taranto, Adriatic Sea, Vlora Bay, Venezzia, Po delta, G. of Trieste, Island of Pag, G. of Gabès, Sfax, Ionian Sea, Aegean Sea, Thracian Sea, Iskenderun Bay, N Lebanon Basin, ? Black Sea, ? Black River estuary), Iskenderoun Bay, W Egyptian coast, Alexandria), Suez Canal (Lake Timsah, Sharm El-Sheikh, Red Sea, off Socotra, NW Indian, Indonesia-Malaysia (Kurau Riv.), Philippines, Korea-Japan, ? SW Mexico (in C.B. Wilson, 1950, p.187) | | | N: | 106 (S Atlant.: 1; N Atlant.: 11; Medit.: 77; ? Black Sea: 6; Suez Canal: 2, Red Sea: 2; Indo-Malaysia: 3 ?; Pacif.: 1 9) | | | Lg.: | | | (46) F: 1,35-1,25; M: 1,2; (353) F: 1,519-1,292; M: 1,406-1,306; (449) F: 1,35-1,25; M: 1,2; (833)* F: 0,866-1,304; M: 0,824-0,95; {F: 1,25-1,52; M: 1,20-1,41} *(833) les longueurs données (cephalosome + abdomen, not fcaudal rami). After Beldescu & al. (1956, in The Black Sea), Lg: F = 0,8-1,2; M = 0,8-1,2; weight F = 0,038 mg; M = 0,010 mg. | | | Rem.: | epipelagic. For Moraitou-Apostolopoulou (1985, p.315) C. kröyeri a dominant copepod in the Levantine Basin, is found in restricted numbers in both the western Mediterranean Sea and the Aegean Sea. In the Black Sea it is possible that Centropages ponticus, a valid species, replace Centropages kroyeri. After El-Sherbiny & al. (2011, p.847) this species in the Lake Timsah (Suez Canal) is well represented in summer. | | | Last update : 25/10/2022 | |
|
Any use of this site for a publication will be mentioned with the following reference : Razouls C., Desreumaux N., Kouwenberg J. and de Bovée F., 2005-2024. - Biodiversity of Marine Planktonic Copepods (morphology, geographical distribution and biological data). Sorbonne University, CNRS. Available at http://copepodes.obs-banyuls.fr/en [Accessed November 14, 2024] © copyright 2005-2024 Sorbonne University, CNRS
|
|
|
|