Planche 1 issued from : G.A. Heron, T.S. English & D.M. Damkaer in J. Crustacean Biol., 1984, 4 (3). [p.471, Fig.12, K-N]. Female (from Arctic): K, habitus (lateral; scale bar: y); L-M, posterior of last prosomal segment and urosome (lateral, and dorsal, respectively; scale bar: w); N, right A1 (scale bar: w).
Planche 2 issued from : G.A. Heron, T.S. English & D.M. Damkaer in J. Crustacean Biol., 1984, 4 (3). [p.474, Fig.13]. Female: A, right A2 (scale bar: w); B, labrum (ventral; scale bar: x); C, right Md (scale bar: x); D, right Mx1 (scale bar: x); E, right Mx2 (scale bar: x); F, right Mxp (scale bar: x); G-J, P1 to P4 (scale bar: w); K, P5 (scale bar: x).
Male: L, habitus (lateral; scale bar: y).
Planche 3 issued from : G.A. Heron, T.S. English & D.M. Damkaer in J. Crustacean Biol., 1984, 4 (3). [p.475, Fig.14, A-E]. Male: A-B, posterior of last prosomal segment of urosome (lateral and dorsal, respectively; scale bar: w); C, left Mxp (scale bar: x); D, endopod of P2 (scale bar: w); E, P5 (scale bar: x).
Distribution
NZ: 2
Carte de distribution de Oncaea delicata par zones géographiques
bathypelagic (collected 1500-1000 m). For Heron & al. (1984, p.476), the species may be distinguished by the 44 endopodite 3 with the marked difference between lengths of the terminal spines, plus the proximal point of insertion of the outer spine, 1/3 the length of the segment from the terminal spines. Most of the specimens were found damagedprobably due to the fragile exoskeleton. The prosomes of many specimens were abnormally expanded, presumably deformed by internal cystic growth.
;)
;)
;)
