Planche 1 issued from : M. Madhupratap & P. Haridas in Hydrobiologia, 1994, 292/293. [p.69, Fig.1]. Female (22°20'N, 69°30'E): G, habitus (dirsal); H, urosome (dorsal); I, idem (right lateral view) with spermatophore fixed.
Male: J, habitus (dorsal); K, urosome (dorsal).Br> Nota female, male: - Urosomal somites as in Acartia southwelli in both sexes. - Posterior corners of pediger 5 rounded. - Urosome without ornamentation; proportion infemale 46 : 19 : 13 : 22 = 100; in male 11 : 29 : 23 : 8 : 12 : 17 = 100. - Details of mouthparts and legs 1-4 as in Acartia southwelli except that cutting edge of Md.
Planche 2 issued from : M. Madhupratap & P. Haridas in Hydrobiologia, 1994, 292/293. [p.71, Fig.3]. Female: F, masticatory edge of the gnathobase of Md.
Planche 3 issued from : M. Madhupratap & P. Haridas in Hydrobiologia, 1994, 292/293. [p.73, Fig.5]. Female: C, P5.
Male: D, P5.
Planche 4 Issued from : H.Y. Soh, S.Y. Moon, E.O. Park & B.A.V. Maran in J. Crustacean Biol., 2013, 33 (5). [p.727, Table 1]. Comparison of morphological features between A. forticrusa and its congeners A. southwelli and A. sarojus
Distribution
NZ: 1
Carte de distribution de Acartia (Euacartia) sarojus par zones géographiques
After Mahdupratap & Haridas (1994, p.73-74), this species differs from Acartia southwelli in some details of the P5 male and female. For the authors it is conceivable that the new species A. sarojus became isolated from the parental population in the process and speciated allopatrically or parapatrically.
 sarojus - Planche 1 of morphological figures',750,500);)
 sarojus - Planche 2 of morphological figures',750,500);)
 sarojus - Planche 3 of morphological figures',750,500);)
 sarojus - Planche 4 of morphological figures',750,500);){kind=small}
 sarojus - Planche 1 of morphological figures){kind=link}
 sarojus - Planche 2 of morphological figures){kind=link}
 sarojus - Planche 3 of morphological figures){kind=link}
 sarojus - Planche 4 of morphological figures){kind=link}